ReviewPolymers2022
Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting: A Review of Cellulose-Based Biomaterials Ink.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation.Biofabrication · 2025Review
- Direct Ink Writing and Photocrosslinking of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose into Stable 3D Parts Using Methacrylation and Blending.Polymers · 2025Article
- Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Food science of animal resources · 2025Review
- Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering: Crosslinking, Printing Techniques, and Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Shape Fidelity Evaluation of Alginate-Based Hydrogels through Extrusion-Based Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Design of a New 3D Gelatin-Alginate Scaffold Loaded withPolymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellulose-based biodegradable hydrogel proves to be excellently suitable for the medical and water treatment industry based on the expressed properties such as its flexible structure and broad compatibility. Moreover, their potential to provide excellent waste management from the unutilized plant has triggered further study on the advanced biomaterial applications. To extend the use of cellulose-based hydrogel, additive manufacturing is a suitable technique for hydrogel fabrication in complex designs. Cellulose-based biomaterial ink used in 3D bioprinting can be further used for tissue engineering, drug delivery, protein study, microalgae, bacteria, and cell immobilization. This review includes a discussion on the techniques available for additive manufacturing, bio-based material, and the formation of a cellulose-based hydrogel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.