Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683828›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Polyhydroxyalkanoates from a Mixed Microbial Culture: Extraction Optimization and Polymer Characterization.

Ana Marta Rodrigues, Rita Dias Guardão Franca, Madalena Dionísio, Chantal Sevrin, Christian Grandfils, Maria A M Reis, Nídia Dana Lourenço

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biosynthesis of Polyhydroalkanoates Doped with Silver Nanoparticles UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Marta RodriguesAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Rita Dias Guardão FrancaAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Madalena DionísioLAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-0889
Chantal SevrinCEIB-Interfaculty Research Centre of Biomaterials, University of Liege, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Christian GrandfilsCEIB-Interfaculty Research Centre of Biomaterials, University of Liege, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Maria A M ReisAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-1836
Nídia Dana LourençoAssociate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-4421
Unidade em Ciências Biomoleculares AplicadasUniversity of Liège · BERede de Química e Tecnologia · PT

Funding

Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (JU) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme INGREEN-838120Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia 2020.08574.BDFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia LA/P/0140/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04378/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04378/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) are biopolymers with potential to replace conventional oil-based plastics. However, PHA high production costs limit their scope of commercial applications. Downstream processing is currently the major cost factor for PHA production but one of the least investigated aspects of the PHA production chain. In this study, the extraction of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) produced at pilot scale by a mixed microbial culture was performed using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) as digestion agents of non-PHA cellular mass. Optimal conditions for digestion with NaOH (0.3 M, 4.8 h) and NaClO (9.0%, 3.4 h) resulted in polymers with a PHA purity and recovery of ca. 100%, in the case of the former and ca. 99% and 90%, respectively, in the case of the latter. These methods presented higher PHA recoveries than extraction by soxhlet with chloroform, the benchmark protocol for PHA extraction. The polymers extracted by the three methods presented similar PHA purities, molecular weights and polydispersity indices. Using the optimized conditions for NaOH and NaClO digestions, this study analyzed the effect of the initial intracellular PHA content (40-70%), biomass concentration (20-100 g/L) and biomass pre-treatment (fresh vs. dried vs. lyophilized) on the performance of PHA extraction by these two methods.

Indexed as

chemical digestiondesign of experimentsPHA extractionpolymer properties

Identifiers

PMID35683828
PMCPMC9182939
OpenAlexW4281871785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.