ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
The European Institute of Oncology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Classification of Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Comparison of artificial intelligence, elastic imaging, and the thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the differential diagnosis of suspicious nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the performance, quality and effectiveness of "IEO-TIRADS" in assigning a TI-RADS score to thyroid nodules (TN) when compared with "EU-TIRADS" and the US risk score calculated with the S-Detect software ("S-Detect"). The primary objective is the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy (DA) by "IEO-TIRADS", "S-Detect" and "EU-TIRADS", and the secondary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the scores, using the histological report as the gold standard.
methodsA radiologist collected all three scores of the TNs detected and determined the risk of malignancy. The results of all the scores were compared with the histological specimens. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and diagnostic accuracy (DA), with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were calculated for each method.
results140 TNs were observed in 93 patients and classified according to all three scores. "IEO-TIRADS" has an SE of 73.6%, an SP of 59.2% and a DA of 68.6%. "EU-TIRADS" has an SE of 90.1%, an SP of 32.7% and a DA of 70.0%. "S-Detect" has an SE of 67.0%, an SP of 69.4% and a DA of 67.9%.
conclusion"IEO-TIRADS" has a similar diagnostic performance to "S-Detect" and "EU-TIRADS". Providing a comparable DA with other reporting systems, IEO-TIRADS holds the potential of being applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.