ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study on the Comparison of Ultrasound Assessment vs. Palpation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in the Era of Targeted Therapy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real‑life diagnostic and therapeutic approach to CLL/SLL in tuscany: the 2025 consensus.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Guideline
- Real-life diagnostic and therapeutic approach to CLL: a 2022 update from an expert panel in Tuscany.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Treated with Fixed Duration Venetoclax-Rituximab: Assessment of Response with Ultrasound, and Relationship with Minimal Residual Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study on the Comparison of Ultrasound Assessment vs. Palpation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in the Era of Targeted Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. In IWCLL guidelines, progressive splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy are signs of active disease. In this study, we have tested the hypotheses if US could be a reliable tool for both superficial lymphnodes (SupLNs) and splenic assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Methods. We enrolled N = 75 patients. SupLN and the spleen were assessed by two independent physicians (M1 and M2) by palpation and by a third physician (M3) with ultrasound sonography (US) using two different sonographers (US1 and US2). The results of M1 vs. M2 assessment, US1 vs. US2, palpation vs. US were compared. The echostructure of N = 1037 SupLN and of the spleen was also investigated. Results. The dimensions of SupLNs assessed by MD1 vs. MD2 were statistically discordant. Splenic size was concordant. There was concordance between US1 and US2 SupLN and splenic assessment. US found a higher number of pathological SupLN (Cohen’s Kappa < 0.1) than palpation, which misses remarkable-sized SupLNs. LN echostructure and splenic involvement patterns were described. Conclusions. US is a reliable, radiation-free tool useful in clinical practice to assess SupLN and splenic involvement in CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.