Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683595›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

New Generation Pulse Modulation in Holmium:YAG Lasers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Antoni Sánchez-Puy, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Pietro Diana, Michael Baboudjian, Alberto Piana, Irene Girón, Andrés K Kanashiro, Oriol Angerri, Pablo Contreras, Brian H Eisner and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Antoni Sánchez-PuyDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandra Bravo-BaladoDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Pietro DianaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-3873
Alberto PianaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9247-7938
Irene GirónDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés K KanashiroDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol AngerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3363-6585
Pablo ContrerasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1118 AAT, Argentina.
Brian H EisnerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Josep BalañàDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco M Sánchez-MartínDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Félix MillánDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Joan PalouDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert IUNA, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: New pulse modulation (PM) technologies in Holmium:YAG lasers are available for urinary stone treatment, but little is known about them. We aim to systematically evaluate the published evidence in terms of their lithotripsy performance. (2) Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases). We included all relevant publications, including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparative and non-comparative studies, and in-vitro studies investigating Holmium:YAG lithotripsy performance employing any new PM. (3) Results: Initial search yielded 203 studies; 24 studies were included after selection: 15 in-vitro, 9 in-vivo. 10 In-vitro compared Moses with regular PM, 1 compared Quanta's, 1 Dornier MedTech's, 2 Moses with super Thulium Fiber Laser, and 1 compared Moses with Quanta PMs. Six out of seven comparative studies found a statistically significant difference in favor of new-generation PM technologies in terms of operative time and five out of six in fragmentation time; two studies evaluated retropulsion, both in favor of new-generation PM. There were no statistically significant differences regarding stone-free rate, lasing and operative time, and complications between Moses and regular PM when data were meta-analyzed. (4) Conclusions: Moses PM seems to have better lithotripsy performance than regular modes in in-vitro studies, but there are still some doubts about its in-vivo results. Little is known about the other PMs. Although some results favor Quanta PMs, further studies are needed.

Indexed as

holmiumlaserpulse modulationurinary stones

Identifiers

PMID35683595
PMCPMC9181640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.