Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683592›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Endomyocardial Cell Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure by Combination of Individual Patient Data (IPD) of ACCRUE and Publication-Based Aggregate Data.

Mariann Gyöngyösi, Evgeny Pokushalov, Aleksander Romanov, Emerson Perin, Joshua M Hare, Jens Kastrup, Francisco Fernández-Avilés, Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz, Anthony Mathur, Wojcieh Wojakowski and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01098591 (Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01098591 completednot on this map

Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs: ACCRUE

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2007 to 2020Enrolled3,500ConditionsIschemic Heart DiseaseArmscell therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Mariann GyöngyösiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7083-2107
Evgeny PokushalovCenter of the New and Modern Medical Technologies, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Aleksander RomanovE. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Emerson PerinStem Cell Center and Adult Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX 37660, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3622-9814
Joshua M HareInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Cardiovascular Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-5032
Jens KastrupCardiology Stem Cell Centre, The Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Francisco Fernández-AvilésCIBERCV, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Sanz-RuizCIBERCV, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Anthony MathurCentre for Cardiovascular Medicine and Devices, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Wojcieh WojakowskiDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Enca Martin-RendonR&D Division, National Health Service (NHS)-Blood and Transplant, Oxford Centre, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Noemi PavoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Imre J PavoDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rayyan HemetsbergerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Denise TraxlerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8679-1525
Andreas SpannbauerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9819-0361
Paul M HallerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-4446
Medical University of Vienna · ATInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESCopenhagen University Hospital · DKMedical University of Silesia · PLMeshalkin National Medical Research Center · RUNational Health Service · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis (ACCRUE, meta-analysis of cell-based cardiac studies, NCT01098591) revealed an insufficient effect of intracoronary cell-based therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Patients with ischemic heart failure (iHF) have been treated with reparative cells using percutaneous endocardial, surgical, transvenous or intracoronary cell delivery methods, with variable effects in small randomized or cohort studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transendocardial cell therapy in patients with iHF. Two investigators extracted the data. Individual patient data (IPD) (n = 8 studies) and publication-based (n = 10 studies) aggregate data were combined for the meta-analysis, including patients (n = 1715) with chronic iHF. The data are reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality and changes in global ejection fraction. The secondary safety and efficacy endpoints were major adverse events, hospitalization and changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Post hoc analyses were performed using the IPD of eight studies to find predictive factors for treatment safety and efficacy. Cell therapy was significantly (p < 0.001) in favor of survival, major adverse events and hospitalization during follow-up. A forest plot analysis showed that cell therapy presents a significant benefit of increasing ejection fraction with a mean change of 2.51% (95% CI: 0.48; 4.54) between groups and of significantly decreasing end-systolic volume. The analysis of IPD data showed an improvement in the NYHA and CCS classes. Cell therapy significantly decreased the end-systolic volume in male patients; in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hyperlipidemia; and in those with previous myocardial infarction and baseline ejection fraction ≤ 45%. The catheter-based transendocardial delivery of regenerative cells proved to be safe and effective for improving mortality and cardiac performance. The greatest benefit was observed in male patients with significant atherosclerotic co-morbidities.

Indexed as

ACCRUEcell-based regeneration therapyhuman clinical trialsmeta-analysispercutaneous transendocardial cell deliverystem cells

Identifiers

PMID35683592
PMCPMC9181462
OpenAlexW4281721143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.