Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683543›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Self-Medication with Drotaverine among Patients with Common Abdominal Symptoms and Treatment Efficacy from the Perspectives of Patients and General Practitioners-An Observational, Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study Using Real-World Data.

Piotr Eder, Piotr Kowalski, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Barbara Skrzydlo-Radomanska, Wojciech Cichy, Katarzyna Proga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr EderDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Medicine, Heliodor Swiecicki University Hospital, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Ul. Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9306-5038
Piotr KowalskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, Al. Hallera 107, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8446-8238
Agnieszka Mastalerz-MigasDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of Wroclaw, Ul. Syrokomli 1, 51-141 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-2760
Barbara Skrzydlo-RadomanskaDepartment and Clinic of Gastroenterology with the Endoscopy Laboratory of the Medical University of Lublin, Aleje Raclawickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech CichyFaculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University-Kalisz, Ul. Nowy Swiat 4, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland.
Katarzyna ProgaPEX PharmaSequence Sp. z o.o., Ul. Klobucka 23, 02-699 Warszawa, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Wrocław · PLUniwersytet Kaliski im. Prezydenta Stanisława Wojciechowskiego · PL

Funding

Sanofi-Aventis Poland Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Poland, drotaverine is the most frequently purchased antispasmodic, yet there is a paucity of real-world data on its use. We evaluated the profiles of patients who used drotaverine, and we investigated prescription patterns among general practitioners (GPs). In this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we asked patients who purchased drotaverine about their reasons for using it, its perceived efficacy, satisfaction with treatment, and physician consultation. We also asked GPs about the status of drotaverine in their practice. Among 650 recruited patients, 74% used drotaverine for pain, 67% for cramps, and 19% for abdominal discomfort. Approximately 83% of patients purchased drotaverine without a physician's advice. Patients who used it after a physician's advice were more frequently female, older, and less educated. For all symptoms, mean severity scores decreased by ~5 points (0-10 scale) after the first dose. Ninety-eight percent of patients were satisfied with drotaverine. Among 210 GPs, the percentages prescribing drotaverine were: 42% for irritable bowel syndrome, 89% for cholelithiasis, 60% as supportive therapy for urinary infections, 89% for nephrolithiasis, and 75% for menstruation pain. The GPs perceived drotaverine as more useful, effective, and tolerable than other drugs for abdominal pain or cramps. Drotaverine significantly reduced the severity of all symptoms for which it was taken, and it was perceived as effective and tolerable.

Indexed as

abdominal crampsabdominal painantispasmodicsdrotaverinereal-world data

Identifiers

PMID35683543
PMCPMC9181793
OpenAlexW4281859245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.