Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683522›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists.

Andrzej Grzybowski, Piotr Brona, Tomasz Krzywicki, Magdalena Gaca-Wysocka, Arleta Berlińska, Anna Święch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrzej GrzybowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-2391
Piotr BronaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Poznan City Hospital, Szwajcarska 3, 60-285 Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz KrzywickiDepartment of Mathematical Methods of Informatics, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-5231
Magdalena Gaca-WysockaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Poznan City Hospital, Szwajcarska 3, 60-285 Poznan, Poland.
Arleta BerlińskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
Anna ŚwięchDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poland has never had a widespread diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program and subsequently has no purpose-trained graders and no established grader training scheme. Herein, we compare the performance and variability of three retinal specialists with no additional DR grading training in assessing images from 335 real-life screening encounters and contrast their performance against IDx-DR, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DR screening suite. A total of 1501 fundus images from 670 eyes were assessed by each grader with a final grade on a per-eye level. Unanimous agreement between all graders was achieved for 385 eyes, and 110 patients, out of which 98% had a final grade of no DR. Thirty-six patients had final grades higher than mild DR, out of which only two had no grader disagreements regarding severity. A total of 28 eyes underwent adjudication due to complete grader disagreement. Four patients had discordant grades ranging from no DR to severe DR between the human graders and IDx-DR. Retina specialists achieved kappa scores of 0.52, 0.78, and 0.61. Retina specialists had relatively high grader variability and only a modest concordance with IDx-DR results. Focused training and verification are recommended for any potential DR graders before assessing DR screening images.

Indexed as

deep learningdiabetic retinopathy gradingdiabetic retinopathy screeninggrader comparisoninter-grader variability

Identifiers

PMID35683522
PMCPMC9180965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.