Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683509›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Endometrial Cancer and BRCA Mutations: A Systematic Review.

Maria Luisa Gasparri, Serena Bellaminutti, Ammad Ahmad Farooqi, Ilaria Cuccu, Violante Di Donato, Andrea Papadia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanocarrier drug delivery systems for gynecological cancer therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Type I or Type II Endometrial Carcinoma? Role of BRCA1 Immunohistochemistry.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  16. Risk of endometrial cancer after RRSO in BRCA 1/2 carriers: a multicentre cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  17. PARP inhibitors in non-ovarian gynecologic cancers.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Endometrial Cancer Risk Among GermlineJCO precision oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Luisa GasparriDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-9527
Serena BellaminuttiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-5828
Ammad Ahmad FarooqiInstitute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), Islamabad 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2209-7483
Ilaria CuccuDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 166, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Violante Di DonatoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 166, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9254-5790
Andrea PapadiaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Ospedale regionale di Lugano · CHPoliclinico Umberto I · ITInstitute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review identifies, evaluates, and summarises the findings of all relevant individual studies on the prevalence of BRCA mutation (BRCAm) in endometrial cancer patients and the incidence of endometrial cancer in BRCAm women patients. Consequently, the benefits and limits of a prophylactic hysterectomy at the time of the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are analysed and discussed. A systematic literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science until May 2022; 13 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, 1613 endometrial cancer patients from 11 cohorts were tested for BRCA1/2 mutation. BRCA1/2m were identified in 4.3% of women with endometrial cancer (70/1613). BRCA1m was the most represented (71.4%) pathogenic variant. Alongside, a total of 209 BRCAm carriers from 14 studies were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Only 5 out of 14 studies found a correlation between BRCAm and an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, two studies found a statistical difference only for BRCA1m women. The present systematic review does not provide strong evidence in favour of performing routine hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; however, it provides epidemiological data that can be useful for counselling patients in order to offer a tailored approach.

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2endometrial cancerhysterectomyrisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID35683509
PMCPMC9181458
OpenAlexW4281661074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.