Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683278›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Numerical Simulation Study of Expanding Fracture of 45 Steel Cylindrical Shell under Different Detonation Pressure.

Zhenwei Huang, Xinlu Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhenwei HuangKey Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ningbo University, Ministry of Education, 818 Fenghua Road, Jiangbei District, Ningbo 315211, China.
Xinlu YuKey Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ningbo University, Ministry of Education, 818 Fenghua Road, Jiangbei District, Ningbo 315211, China.
Ningbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detonation and fragmentation of ductile cylindrical metal shells is a complicated physical phenomenon of material and structural fracture under a high strain rate and high-speed impact. In this article, the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) numerical model is adopted to study this problem. The model's reliability is initially tested by comparing the simulation findings with experimental data, and it shows that different fracture modes of cylindrical shells can be obtained by using the same model with a unified constitutive model and failure parameters. By using this model to analyze the explosive fracture process of the cylindrical shells at various detonation pressures, it shows that when the detonation pressure decreases, the cylindrical metal shell fracture changes from a pure shear to tensile-shear mixed fracture. When the detonation pressure is above 31 GPA, a pure shear fracture appears in the shell during the loading stage of shell expansion, and the crack has an angle of 45° or 135° from the radial direction. When the pressure is reduced to 23 GPA, the fracture mode changes to tension-shear mixing, and the proportion of tensile cracks is about one-sixth of the shell fracture. With the explosion pressure reduced to 13 GPA, the proportion of tensile cracks is increased to about one-half of the shell fracture. Finally, the failure mechanism of the different fracture modes was analyzed under different detonation pressures by studying the stress and strain curves in the shells.

Indexed as

45 steelcylindrical shell fractureSPH numerical simulation

Identifiers

PMID35683278
PMCPMC9182440
OpenAlexW4281705261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.