Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683136›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo.

Solomiya Kyyak, Sebastian Blatt, Nadine Wiesmann, Ralf Smeets, Peer W Kaemmerer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06783517 (Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid in Addition to Xenograft Material in Treatment Peri-implant Bony Defects in Immediate Implant Placement Within Maxillary Esthetic Zone), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06783517 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid in Addition to Xenograft Material in Treatment Peri-implant Bony Defects in Immediate Implant Placement Within Maxillary Esthetic Zone

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsEffect of Putty Form Bone Graft in Immediate Implant PlacmentArmscerabone, cerabone®plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Bone Regeneration: Mini-Review and Appealing Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Solomiya KyyakDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian BlattDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Nadine WiesmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Ralf SmeetsDivision "Regenerative Orofacial Medicine", University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Peer W KaemmererDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-3764
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The effective induction of angiogenesis is directly related to the success of bone-substitute materials (BSM) for maxillofacial osseous regeneration. Therefore, the addition of pro-angiogenic properties to a commercially available bovine bone-substitute material in combination with hyaluronic acid (BSM+) was compared to the same bone-substitute material without hyaluronic acid (BSM) in an in-vivo model. Materials and Methods: BSM+ and BSM were incubated for six days on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of fertilized chicken eggs. Microscopically, the number of vessels and branching points, the vessel area and vessel length were evaluated. Subsequently, the total vessel area and brightness integration were assessed after immunohistochemical staining (H&E, alphaSMA). Results: In the BSM+ group, a significantly higher number of vessels (p < 0.001), branching points (p = 0.001), total vessel area (p < 0.001) as well as vessel length (p = 0.001) were found in comparison to the BSM group without hyaluronic acid. Immunohistochemically, a significantly increased total vessel area (p < 0.001 for H&E, p = 0.037 for alphaSMA) and brightness integration (p = 0.047) for BSM+ in comparison to the native material were seen. Conclusions: The combination of a xenogenic bone-substitute material with hyaluronic acid significantly induced angiogenesis in vivo. This might lead to a faster integration and an improved healing in clinical situations.

Indexed as

angiogenesisbiofunctionalizationchick-embryo chorioallantoic membrane assayhyaluronic acidosteogenesisxenogenic bone-substitute material

Identifiers

PMID35683136
PMCPMC9181602
OpenAlexW4281698376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.