Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683098›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Optimal Design of Ceramic Based Hip Implant Composites Using Hybrid AHP-MOORA Approach.

Tej Singh, Chandramani Goswami, Amar Patnaik, László Lendvai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tej SinghSavaria Institute of Technology, Faculty of Informatics, Eötvös Loránd University, 9700 Szombathely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2316-4107
Chandramani GoswamiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Arya College of Engineering and Information Technology, Jaipur 302028, India.
Amar PatnaikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur 302017, India.
László LendvaiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Gyor, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3670-327X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing excellent hip implant composite material with optimal physical, mechanical and wear properties is challenging. Improper hip implant composite design may result in a premature component and product failure. Therefore, a hybrid decision-making tool was proposed to select the optimal hip implant composite according to several criteria that are probably conflicting. In varying weight proportions, a series of hip implant composite materials containing different ceramics (magnesium oxide, zirconium oxide, chromium oxide, silicon nitride and aluminium oxide) were fabricated and evaluated for wear and physicomechanical properties. The density, void content, hardness, indentation depth, elastic modulus, compressive strength, wear, and fracture toughness values were used to rank the hip implant composites. It was found that the density and void content of the biocomposites remain in the range of 3.920-4.307 g/cm

Indexed as

AHP-MOORAceramichip implant compositesoptimisationphysicomechanical

Identifiers

PMID35683098
PMCPMC9181206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.