Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872427National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872428National Natural Science Foundation of China 31902214National Natural Science Foundation of China 32060777Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2018jcyjAX0528Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0096Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2020jscx-msxmX0045
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Analysis of Silver Nanoparticles for the Treatment and Prevention of Nucleopolyhedrovirus Affecting · full record | OpenQuestion