ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Molecular Markers of Kidney Transplantation Outcome: Current Omics Tools and Future Developments.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exfoliated kidney cells from urine for non-invasive kidney transplant monitoring: A potential opportunity?Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- Clinical implications of plasma sADAM10: integrating renal function, histopathology and prognostic outcomes in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Advantages of Metabolomics-Based Multivariate Machine Learning to Predict Disease Severity: Example of COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Predicting Cellular Rejection of Renal Allograft Based on the Serum Proteomic Fingerprint.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Inferring the diagnostic potential of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in post-renal transplantation from a unique case harboring multiple rare complications.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Potential utility of urinary chemokine CCL2 to creatinine ratio in prognosis of 5-year graft failure and mortality post 1-year protocol biopsy in kidney transplant recipients.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Article
- Biomarker-Development Proteomics in Kidney Transplantation: An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Molecular Frontiers in Transplantation-Induced Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe emerging field of molecular predictive medicine is aiming to change the traditional medical approach in renal transplantation. Many studies have explored potential biomarker molecules with predictive properties in renal transplantation, issued from omics research. Herein, we review the biomarker molecules of four technologies (i.e., Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, and Metabolomics) associated with favorable kidney transplant outcomes. RECENT
findingsSeveral panels of molecules have been associated with the outcome that the majority of markers are related to inflammation and immune response; although. other molecular ontologies are also represented, such as proteasome, growth, regeneration, and drug metabolism. Throughout this review, we highlight the lack of properly validated statistical demonstration. Indeed, the most preeminent molecular panels either remain at the limited size study stage or are not confirmed during large-scale studies. At the core of this problem, we identify the methodological shortcomings and propose a comprehensive workflow for discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers that aims to improve the relevance of these tools in the future. SUMMARY: Overall, adopting a patient management through omics approach could bring remarkable improvement to transplantation success. An increased effort and investment between scientists, medical biologists, and clinicians seem to be the path toward a proper solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.