Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682479›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Inappropriate Prescriptions in Older People-Translation and Adaptation to Portuguese of the STOPP/START Screening Tool.

Luís Monteiro, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Cristiano Matos, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Andreia Teixeira, Carlos Martins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deprescribing: Reducing Harm, Enhancing Care.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luís MonteiroCINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-5770
Matilde Monteiro-SoaresCINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.
Cristiano MatosDepartment of Mathematics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-1421
Inês Ribeiro-VazCINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.
Andreia TeixeiraCINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-2220
Carlos MartinsCINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-5167
Universidade do Porto · PTPolytechnic Institute of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate prescribing, which encompasses the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), is a common problem for older people. The STOPP/START tool enables general practitioners, who are the main prescribers, to identify and reduce the incidence of PIMs and PPOs and appraise an older patient’s prescribed drugs during the diagnosis process to improve the clinical care quality. This study aimed to translate and validate the STOPP/START screening tool to enable its use by Portuguese physicians. A translation-back translation method including the validation of the obtained Portuguese version was used. Intra- and inter-rater reliability and agreement analyses were used in the validation process. A dataset containing the information of 334 patients was analyzed by one GP twice within a 2-week interval, while a dataset containing the information of 205 patients was independently analyzed by three GPs. Intra-rater reliability assessment led to a Kappa coefficient (κ) of 0.70 (0.65−0.74) for the STOPP criteria and 0.60 (0.52−0.68) for the START criteria, considered to be substantial and moderate values, respectively. The results of the inter-rater reliability rating were almost perfect for all combinations of raters (κ > 0.93). The version of the STOPP/START criteria translated into Portuguese represents an improvement in managing the medications prescribed to the elderly. It provides clinicians with a screening tool for detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing in patients older than 65 years old that is reliable and easy to use.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedHumansPortugalReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsgeneral medicinegeriatric medicinequality in health careSTOPP/START

Identifiers

PMID35682479
PMCPMC9180165
OpenAlexW4281764317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.