Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682394›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Return to Work of Healthcare Workers after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Determinants of Physical and Mental Health.

Maddalena Grazzini, Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli, Nicola Mucci, Diana Paolini, Antonio Baldassarre, Veronica Gallinoro, Annarita Chiarelli, Fabrizio Niccolini, Giulio Arcangeli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of Post-COVID-19 Condition on Frontline Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Post-COVID Symptoms in Occupational Cohorts: Effects on Health and Work Ability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Post-COVID condition or "long COVID", return-to work, and occupational health research.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023
    Article
  15. Physical Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Population of Italian Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maddalena GrazziniHealth Direction, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Lucrezia Ginevra LulliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4342-966X
Nicola MucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-1035
Diana PaoliniHealth Direction, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-5710
Antonio BaldassarreDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-3570
Veronica GallinoroMedical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-3402
Annarita ChiarelliOccupational Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Fabrizio NiccoliniHealth Direction, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Giulio ArcangeliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has involved healthcare workers (HCWs) both as caregivers and as patients. This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the HCWs working in a third-level hospital in Central Italy who were infected with COVID-19 from March 2020 to April 2021. This research aims at identifying the physical and mental health outcomes of HCWs infected with COVID-19 who returned to work after the infection, the determinants of those outcomes, such as age and sex, and the identification of possible vulnerable professional groups. Methods. A questionnaire about the acute illness, the experience of returning to work, and health perceptions after the disease was administered to 427 healthcare workers 3 months after recovering from the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results. The majority interviewed (84.5%) reported symptoms at the time of the positive test, with no significant differences regarding age or sex, while a significant difference in the mean age was found regarding hospitalization (p < 0.001). At 3 months after the infection, females (p = 0.001), older workers (p < 0.001), and healthcare assistants (p < 0.001) were more likely to report persistent symptoms. Sex (p = 0.02) and age (p = 0.006) influenced the quality of sleep after the infection. At work, the nurses group reported increase in workload (p = 0.03) and worse relationships (p = 0.028). At 3 months after the infection, female workers perceived worse physical (p = 0.002) and mental (p < 0.001) health status according to the SF-12. A negative correlation was found between age and PCS score (p < 0.001) but not MCS score (p = 0.86). A significant difference in PCS score was found between nurses and physicians (p = 0.04) and between residents and all other groups (p < 0.001). Finally, the group of workers reporting sleep alterations showed lower PCS and MCS scores (p < 0.001) and working relationships had an impact on MCS scores (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Age, sex, and type of job had an impact on physical and mental outcomes. Organizing specific interventions, also tailored to professional sub-groups, should be a target for healthcare systems to protect and boost the physical and mental health of their workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthRetrospective StudiesReturn to WorkSARS-CoV-2aging workforcegenderhealthcare workershealth perceptionoccupational healthoccupational wellbeingresiliencereturn to workSARS-CoV-2 infectionsleep alterations

Identifiers

PMID35682394
PMCPMC9180816
OpenAlexW4281617904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.