Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682382›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Use of Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: A Drug-Utilization Study Using Tuscan Administrative Databanks.

Sabrina Giometto, Silvia Tillati, Laura Baglietto, Nicola De Bortoli, Marta Mosca, Marco Conte, Marco Tuccori, Rosa Gini, Ersilia Lucenteforte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina GiomettoUnit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-1778
Silvia TillatiUnit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Laura BagliettoUnit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Nicola De BortoliUnit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-1060
Marta MoscaUnit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Marco ConteCESP, U1018 INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Hôpital Paul Brousse Bâtiment 15/16, CEDEX, 94807 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-2357
Marco TuccoriUnit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-8486
Rosa GiniTuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, 50141 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-877X
Ersilia LucenteforteUnit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5608-5902
University of Pisa · ITAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study aims at providing evidence on patterns of use of biologic drugs for psoriasis in Tuscany, Italy. We conducted a drug-utilization study based on administrative databanks of Tuscany (EUPAS45365) from 2011 to 2019. We selected new users of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, or secukinumab between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016. We considered subjects with psoriasis and followed subjects until the end of the study period (three years after the first dispensation of biologic drug for psoriasis) or the patient's death, whichever came first. We censored subjects for pregnancy or neoplasia. For each subject, we defined the state as the weekly coverage of one of the biologic drugs of interest. We then defined the switch as the change from a state to another one. A total of 7062 subjects with a first dispensation of a PSObio drug in the inclusion period was identified, and 1839 (52.9% female, 51.6 mean age) patients were included in the analysis. Among new users of adalimumab (N = 770, 41.9%), one third showed a continuous behaviour whereas the others moved to etanercept and ustekinumab. New users of etanercept (N = 758, 41.2%), had the highest proportion of switchers, with adalimumab most often being the second choice. New users of infliximab (N = 159, 8.6%) experienced the highest proportion of treatment discontinuation. The present study suggests that the majority of patients treated with PSObio drugs do not switch from one active ingredient to another. However, patients who started biological therapy with etanercept had the highest frequency of switching to other PSObio drugs, whereas those who started with secukinumab or ustekinumab had the lowest.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisAdalimumabEtanerceptFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUstekinumabAdalimumabBiological ProductsEtanerceptInfliximabUstekinumabbiologicsdrug utilizationpsoriasisswitching

Identifiers

PMID35682382
PMCPMC9180218
OpenAlexW4281661664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.