Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effort-Reward Imbalance among a Sample of Formal US Solid Waste Workers.

Aurora B Le, Abas Shkembi, Anna C Sturgis, Anupon Tadee, Shawn G Gibbs, Richard L Neitzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aurora B LeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6866-6779
Abas ShkembiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-861X
Anna C SturgisDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Anupon TadeeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-8211
Shawn G GibbsDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-5166
Richard L NeitzelDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-2589

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Solid waste workers are exposed to a plethora of occupational hazards and may also experience work-related stress. Our study had three specific hypotheses: (1) waste workers experience effort−reward imbalance (ERI) with high self-reported effort but low reward, (2) unionized workers experience greater ERI, and (3) workers with higher income have lower ERI. Methods: Waste workers from three solid waste sites in Michigan participated in this cross-sectional study. We characterized perceived work stress using the short-version ERI questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and linear tests for trend were assessed for each scale. Linear regression models were constructed to examine the relationship between structural factors of work stress and ERI. Gradient-boosted regression trees evaluated which factors of effort or reward best characterize workers’ stress. Results: Among 68 participants, 37% of workers reported high effort and low reward from work (ERI > 1). Constant pressure due to heavy workload was most indicative of ERI among the solid waste workers. Union workers experienced 79% times higher ERI than non-unionized workers, while no significant differences were observed by income, after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: Organizational-level interventions, such as changes related to workload, consideration of fair compensation, and increased support from supervisors, can decrease work stress.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionOccupational StressCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRewardSolid WasteStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadSolid Wasteeffort–reward imbalancepsychosocial factors of workwaste workerswork stress

Identifiers

PMID35682374
PMCPMC9179994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.