Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682353›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Process Evaluation of "The Hygienic Family" Intervention: A Community-Based Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Project in Rural Malawi.

Mindy Panulo, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Tara K Beattie, Elizabeth Tilley, Christabel Kambala, Tracy Morse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mindy PanuloCentre for Water, Sanitation, Health and Appropriate Technology Development (WASHTED), Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Private Bag 303, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-0180
Kondwani ChidziwisanoCentre for Water, Sanitation, Health and Appropriate Technology Development (WASHTED), Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Private Bag 303, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Tara K BeattieDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Level 5 James Weir Building, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.
Elizabeth TilleyDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Christabel KambalaDepartment of Environmental Health, Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Private Bag 303, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Tracy MorseCentre for Water, Sanitation, Health and Appropriate Technology Development (WASHTED), Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Private Bag 303, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0003-4185-9471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process evaluations of environmental health interventions are often under-reported and under-utilized in the development of future programs. The "Hygienic Family" intervention targeted improvements in hygiene behaviors of caregivers with under five-year-old children in rural Malawi. Delivered through a combination of open days, cluster meetings, household visits, and prompts, data were collected from two intervention areas for ten months. A process evaluation framework provided indicators that were measured through intervention implementation and expenditure reports, focus groups discussions, interviews, and household surveys. The collected data assessed the intervention fidelity, dose, reach, acceptability, impact, and cost. Results indicated that all planned hygiene promotion messages were delivered, and study participants were better reached primarily through household visits (78% attended over 75% of the intervention) than cluster meetings (57% attended over 75% of the intervention). However, regression found that the number of household visits or cluster meetings had no discernible effect on the presence of some household hygiene proxy indicators. Intervention implementation cost per household was USD 31.00. The intervention delivery model provided good fidelity, dose, and reach and could be used to strengthen the scope of child health and wellbeing content. The intensive face-to-face method has proven to be effective but would need to be adequately resourced through financial support for community coordinator remuneration.

Indexed as

SanitationWaterChildChild, PreschoolHumansHygieneMalawiRural PopulationWatercommunity healthfood hygienefood safetyhygieneMalawiprocess evaluationWASH

Identifiers

PMID35682353
PMCPMC9180059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.