Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening-The Polish Experience.

Anna Zagaja, Renata Bogusz, Jarosław Sak, Michał Wiechetek, Jakub Pawlikowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna ZagajaChair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-5749
Renata BoguszChair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Jarosław SakChair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-0683
Michał WiechetekInstitute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3831-9928
Jakub PawlikowskiChair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8277-8515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the leading forms of cancers in women worldwide. In Poland, it accounts for approx. 20% of all cancers diagnosed, with approximately 11,000 new cases and 5000 deaths from this disease annually. To prevent unfavourable statistics, Poland introduced free breast cancer screening programmes, available to women aged 50-69. Over a million women take advantage of this programme each year. The aim of the research was to assess the quality of consent women give prior to mammography screening and address the question of whether this quality is sufficient to make an informed choice. The study was conducted on a representative group of 600 Polish women over 50 years old (475 of them had undergone mammography screening), who agreed to take part in the study. Using the computer-assisted interview technology (CATI) method, all women were asked about their perception of breast cancer and screening and those who had undergone mammography were quizzed about the consent process. They will form the focus of this research. The validated tool contained items on both the benefits and risks of screening. The results indicate that the quality of informed consent was insufficient. A discrepancy was observed in the awareness between the benefits and risks of mammography screening. The main motivations to undergo screening were: prophylactic purposes and the free-of-charge nature of this health service. Population-based screening programmes for breast cancer should be reconsidered in terms of information policy, and the quality of informed consent should be increased.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPolandbenefit–risk ratiobreast cancer screeningmammographyquality of informed consent

Identifiers

PMID35682316
PMCPMC9180228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.