Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682256›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Strengthening Australia's Chemical Regulation.

Arlene Gabriela, Sarah Leong, Philip S W Ong, Derek Weinert, Joe Hlubucek, Peter W Tait

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arlene GabrielaMedical School, Australian National University, Florey Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Sarah LeongMedical School, Australian National University, Florey Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Philip S W OngMedical School, Australian National University, Florey Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Derek WeinertMedical School, Australian National University, Florey Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Joe HlubucekPublic Health Association of Australia, 20 Napier Close Deakin, Deakin, ACT 2600, Australia.
Peter W TaitMedical School, Australian National University, Florey Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultural and veterinary (Agvet) chemicals and industrial chemicals, which are regulated, respectively, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), and the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS). The current frameworks have been considered fragmented, inefficient, and most importantly, unsafe in prioritizing human health. We evaluated these frameworks, identified gaps, and suggested improvements that would help bring chemical regulation in Australia in line with comparative regulations in the EU, US, and Canada. Several weaknesses in the Australian frameworks include the lack of a national program to monitor chemical residues, slow pace in conducting chemical reviews, inconsistent risk management across states and territories, a paucity of research efforts on human health impacts, and inadequate framework assessment systems. Recommendations for Australia include establishing a national surveillance and chemical residue monitoring system, harmonizing risk assessment and management across jurisdictions, improving chemical review efficiency, and developing regular performance review mechanisms to ensure that human health is protected.

Indexed as

PesticidesVeterinary DrugsAgricultureAustraliaHumansRisk AssessmentPesticidesVeterinary Drugsagvet chemicalsAICISAPVMAAustralian chemical policiesAustralian chemical regulatory frameworkschemical exposurehuman healthindustrial chemicals

Identifiers

PMID35682256
PMCPMC9180067
OpenAlexW4281997793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.