Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Cardioversion of Post-Ablation Atrial Tachyarrhythmia with Ibutilide and Amiodarone: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Filippo Cacioppo, Michael Schwameis, Nikola Schuetz, Julia Oppenauer, Sebastian Schnaubelt, Alexander Simon, Martin Lutnik, Sophie Gupta, Dominik Roth, Harald Herkner and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo CacioppoMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6095-4899
Michael SchwameisMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-6877
Nikola SchuetzMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Julia OppenauerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1538-9886
Sebastian SchnaubeltMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0057-8200
Alexander SimonClinic Ottakring, Department of Emergency Medicine, Montleartstraße 37, 1160 Vienna, Austria.
Martin LutnikMedical University of Vienna, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sophie GuptaMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Dominik RothMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Harald HerknerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-6149
Alexander Oskar SpielMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-2703
Anton Norbert LaggnerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Hans DomanovitsMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Jan NiederdoecklMedical University of Vienna, Department of Emergency Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2270
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter constitute a rapidly growing cohort, but study-driven treatment recommendations are lacking. The present study aimed to compare the cardioversion success of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients with post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia. We included all episodes of post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with either intravenous ibutilide or amiodarone at an academic emergency department from 2010 to 2018. The primary endpoint was the conversion to sinus rhythm. The conversion rates were stratified by arrhythmia type, and multivariable cluster-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of ibutilide and amiodarone on cardioversion success, given as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 109 episodes of 72 patients were analyzed. The conversion rates were 37/49 (76%) for ibutilide and 16/60 (27%) for amiodarone. Compared to amiodarone, ibutilide was associated with higher odds of conversion (multivariable cluster-adjusted OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3-24.3). The cardioversion success of ibutilide was the highest in atrial flutter (crude OR 19.5, 95% CI 3.4-112.5) and focal atrial tachycardia (crude OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.5-47.2), but it was less pronounced in atrial fibrillation (crude OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2-17.2). Randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneAtrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCohort StudiesElectric CountershockHumansRegistriesSulfonamidesTachycardiaTreatment OutcomeAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsibutilideSulfonamidesAmiodaronecatheter ablationIbutilidesupraventriculartachycardia

Identifiers

PMID35682190
PMCPMC9180807
OpenAlexW4281691620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.