Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682161›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Drug Consumption Rooms and Public Health Policy: Perspectives of Scottish Strategic Decision-Makers.

James Nicholls, Wulf Livingston, Andy Perkins, Beth Cairns, Rebecca Foster, Kirsten M A Trayner, Harry R Sumnall, Tracey Price, Paul Cairney, Josh Dumbrell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the reach and engagement with the 'Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James NichollsFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Wulf LivingstonFaculty of Social and Life Sciences, Glyndwr University, Wrexham LL11 2AW, UK.
Andy PerkinsFigure 8 Consultancy, Dundee DD4 0HU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-6642
Beth CairnsFigure 8 Consultancy, Dundee DD4 0HU, UK.
Rebecca FosterFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-1801
Kirsten M A TraynerSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Harry R SumnallFaculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2QB, UK.
Tracey PriceFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Paul CairneyFaculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9956-832X
Josh DumbrellFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Tessa ParkesFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is widespread support for the introduction of Drug Consumption Rooms (DCRs) in Scotland as part of a policy response to record levels of drug-related harm. However, existing legal barriers are made more complex by the division of relevant powers between the UK and Scottish Governments. This paper reports on a national, qualitative study of key decision-makers in both local and national roles across Scotland. It explores views on the political barriers and enablers to the adoption of Drug Consumption Rooms and the potential role of these facilities in the wider treatment system. It also considers approaches to evidence, especially the types of evidence that are considered valuable in supporting decision-making in this area. The study found that Scottish decision-makers are strongly supportive of DCR adoption; however, they remain unclear as to the legal and political mechanisms that would make this possible. They view DCRs as part of a complex treatment and support system rather than a uniquely transformative intervention. They see the case for introduction as sufficient, on the basis of need and available evidence, thus adopting a pragmatic and iterative approach to evidence, in contrast to an appeal to traditional evidence hierarchies more commonly adopted by the UK Government.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionSubstance-Related DisordersDecision MakingHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthScotlanddrug consumption roomsdrugsharm reductioninterventionsoverdose prevention centrespolicyproblem drug usepublic healthsafer injecting facilitiesScotland

Identifiers

PMID35682161
PMCPMC9180147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.