Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682014›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of a Daily Physical Activity Unit in Schools: Focus on Children and Adolescents in Austria Up to the 8th Grade.

Madlene Movia, Sandra Macher, Gabriele Antony, Verena Zeuschner, Gabriela Wamprechtsamer, Judith Delle Grazie, Helmut Simi, Bianca Fuchs-Neuhold

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madlene MoviaInstitute of Health and Tourism Management, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.
Sandra MacherInstitute of Health and Tourism Management, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-5943
Gabriele AntonyAustrian National Public Health Institute, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Verena ZeuschnerHealthy Austria Fund, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Gabriela WamprechtsamerFederal Ministry Republic of Austria-Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Judith Delle GrazieFederal Ministry Republic of Austria-Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Helmut SimiInstitute of Health and Tourism Management, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-6265
Bianca Fuchs-NeuholdInstitute of Health and Tourism Management, FH JOANNEUM-University of Applied Sciences, 8344 Bad Gleichenberg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1213-4220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity has a variety of health benefits for young people. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children and adolescents aged 5-17 years should be physically active for at least 60 min a day. This Health Impact Assessment (HIA) examined the potential impact of a daily physical activity unit in Austrian schools, with a focus on children and adolescents up to eighth grade. The HIA methodology systematically followed several stages: screening and scoping, appraisal, and formulation of recommendations. A literature review, an online survey (

Indexed as

Health Impact AssessmentSchoolsAdolescentAustriaChildEducational StatusExerciseHumansadolescentsAustriachildrenhealth impact assessmentphysical activitypupilsschool setting

Identifiers

PMID35682014
PMCPMC9180436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.