Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682010›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Connecting Healthcare with Income Maximisation Services: A Systematic Review on the Health, Wellbeing and Financial Impacts for Families with Young Children.

Jade Burley, Nora Samir, Anna Price, Anneka Parker, Anna Zhu, Valsamma Eapen, Diana Contreras-Suarez, Natalie Schreurs, Kenny Lawson, Raghu Lingam and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Role of Socioeconomic Determinants in Children's Health.Portuguese journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jade BurleySydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
Nora SamirSydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6571-6622
Anna PriceCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Anneka ParkerPopulation Child Health Research Group, School of Women and Children's Health, University of NSW, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Anna ZhuSchool of Economics, Marketing and Finance, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Valsamma EapenBestSTART-SWS, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-8306
Diana Contreras-SuarezMelbourne Institute, Applied Economic & Social Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-7029
Natalie SchreursCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Kenny LawsonTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Raghu LingamSydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
Rebekah GraceBestSTART-SWS, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Shanti RamanBestSTART-SWS, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Lynn KempCentre for the Transformation of Early Education and Child Health (TeEACH), Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.
Rebecca BishopWesley Mission, 220 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2500, Australia.
Sharon GoldfeldCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6520-7094
Susan WoolfendenPopulation Child Health Research Group, School of Women and Children's Health, University of NSW, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Ingham Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUMission Australia · AURMIT University · AUSydney Local Health District · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial counselling and income-maximisation services have the potential to reduce financial hardship and its associated burdens on health and wellbeing in High Income Countries. However, referrals to financial counselling services are not systematically integrated into existing health service platforms, thus limiting our ability to identify and link families who might be experiencing financial hardship. Review evidence on this is scarce. The purpose of this study is to review "healthcare-income maximisation" models of care in high-income countries for families of children aged between 0 and 5 years experiencing financial difficulties, and their impacts on family finances and the health and wellbeing of parent(s)/caregiver(s) or children. A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, ProQuest, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Cochrane Library, and Informit Online databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of six studies (five unique samples) met inclusion criteria, which reported a total of 11,603 families exposed to a healthcare-income maximisation model. An average annual gain per person of £1661 and £1919 was reported in two studies reporting one Scottish before-after study, whereby health visitors/midwives referred 4805 clients to money advice services. In another UK before-after study, financial counsellors were attached to urban primary healthcare centres and reported an average annual gain per person of £1058. The randomized controlled trial included in the review reported no evidence of impacts on financial or non-financial outcomes, or maternal health outcomes, but did observe small to moderate effects on child health and well-being. Small to moderate benefits were seen in areas relating to child health, preschool education, parenting, child abuse, and early behavioral adjustment. There was a high level of bias in most studies, and insufficient evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of healthcare-income maximisation models of care. Rigorous (RCT-level) studies with clear evaluations are needed to assess efficacy and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Child HealthIncomeChildChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHealth ServicesHumansInfantInfant, Newbornchild health and wellbeinghealthcareincome maximisationpovertypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35682010
PMCPMC9180526
OpenAlexW4281485468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.