Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35682004›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review.

Ana Paula Pagano, Katherine L Ford, Kathryn N Porter Starr, Nicole Kiss, Helen Steed, Janice Y Kung, Rajavel Elango, Carla M Prado

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Energy expenditure in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Paula PaganoHuman Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7325-0359
Katherine L FordHuman Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8620-9360
Kathryn N Porter StarrDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Nicole KissInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong 3217, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-9834
Helen SteedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Janice Y KungJohn W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8676-8675
Rajavel ElangoDepartment of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-1725
Carla M PradoHuman Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
University of Alberta · CADeakin University · AUDuke University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Nutritional (High Protein) Perihabilitation in Older Veterans Undergoing SurgeryIK2RX002348 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI STARR, KATHRYN N · 2017 to 2021
–
CIHR FRN: PJT - 159537RRD VA IK2 RX002348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining energy requirements is vital for optimizing nutrition interventions in pro-catabolic conditions such as cancer. Gynecological cancer encompasses the most common malignancies in women, yet there is a paucity of research on its metabolic implications. The aim of this review was to explore the literature related to energy metabolism in gynecological cancers. We were particularly interested in exploring the prevalence of energy metabolism abnormalities, methodological approaches used to assess energy metabolism, and clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. A search strategy was conducted from inception to 27 July 2021. Studies investigating energy metabolism using accurate techniques in adults with any stage of gynecological cancer and the type of treatment were considered. Of the 874 articles screened for eligibility, five studies were included. The definition of energy metabolism abnormalities varied among studies. Considering this limitation, four of the five studies reported hypermetabolism. One of these studies found that hypermetabolism was more prevalent in ovarian compared to cervical cancer. Of the included studies, one reported normometabolism at the group level; individual-level values were not reported. One of the studies reported hypermetabolism pre- and post-treatment, but normometabolism when re-assessed two years post-treatment. No studies explored clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. Overall, commonly used equations may not accurately predict energy expenditure in gynecological cancers, which can profoundly impact nutritional assessment and intervention.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansNutritional RequirementsNutrition AssessmentPrevalencecancerenergy expenditureenergy metabolismenergy needsgynecological cancersnutrition assessmentresting energy expenditurereview

Identifiers

PMID35682004
PMCPMC9180127
OpenAlexW4281478706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.