Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681922›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

First Description of Serological Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 in Lactating Cows.

Filomena Fiorito, Valentina Iovane, Ugo Pagnini, Claudia Cerracchio, Sergio Brandi, Martina Levante, Luisa Marati, Gianmarco Ferrara, Virginio Tammaro, Esterina De Carlo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filomena FioritoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-7807
Valentina IovaneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Ugo PagniniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Claudia CerracchioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Sergio BrandiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Martina LevanteIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Luisa MaratiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Gianmarco FerraraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-7976
Virginio TammaroAzienda Sanitaria Locale Avellino (Ariano Irpino), 83031 Avellino, Italy.
Esterina De CarloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe IovaneDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Giovanna FuscoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-7672
University of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · ITASL Roma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in Ariano Irpino, Campania region (Italy), we tested lactating cows for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on a cattle farm at which, prior to the investigation, 13 of the 20 farmworkers showed COVID-19-like symptoms, and one of them died. Twenty-four lactating cows were sampled to detect SARS-CoV-2. All nasal and rectal swabs and milk samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Of the 24 collected serum samples, 11 showed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, 14 showed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and 13 developed neutralising antibodies for SARS-COV-2; all samples were negative for Bovine Coronavirus (BCoV), another betacoronavirus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of natural serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lactating cows. We hypothesise that this may be a case of reverse zoonosis. However, the role of cattle in SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission seems to be negligible.

Indexed as

cattleCOVID-19farmworkersreverse zoonosisSARS-CoV-2serology

Identifiers

PMID35681922
PMCPMC9179237
OpenAlexW4281717100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.