Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681902›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Spoilage Bacteria Counts on Broiler Meat at Different Stages of Commercial Poultry Processing Plants That Use Peracetic Acid.

Hudson T Thames, Courtney A Fancher, Mary G Colvin, Mika McAnally, Emily Tucker, Li Zhang, Aaron S Kiess, Thu T N Dinh, Anuraj T Sukumaran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic Expression ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Aerotolerance and Multi-Locus Sequence Typing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. The Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hudson T ThamesDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8039-6874
Courtney A FancherDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Mary G ColvinDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-305X
Mika McAnallyDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Emily TuckerDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Li ZhangDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-5794
Aaron S KiessDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Thu T N DinhDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Anuraj T SukumaranDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-5947
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

Mississippi agriculture and forestry experiment station 322380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In poultry processing, spoilage microbes are persistent microorganisms, which affect the quality of broiler meat. Peracetic acid (PAA) is the most common antimicrobial used by commercial processing plants, which can reduce the prevalence of these microbes. The goal of this study was to determine the concentrations of aerobic bacteria, coliforms, lactic acid bacteria, and Pseudomonas on broiler meat in processing plants that use peracetic acid in various concentrations as the primary antimicrobial. Samples were collected from three processing plants at five processing steps: post-pick (defeathering), pre-chill, post-chill, mechanically deboned meat (MDM), and drumsticks. Samples were rinsed in buffered peptone water for bacteria isolation. Over six log CFU/sample of aerobic plate counts (APC), lactic acid bacteria, and coliforms were detected on post-pick samples. All spoilage bacteria were reduced to nondetectable levels on post-chill samples (p < 0.001). However, the presence of all bacteria on mechanically deboned meat (MDM) samples indicated varying degrees of cross contamination from post-chill and MDM samples. These results suggest PAA effectively reduces spoilage microbes in chilling applications irrespective of differences in PAA concentrations. However, due to the levels of spoilage microbes detected in MDM, it may be worth investigating the potential interventions for this stage of processing.

Indexed as

broilerperacetic acidpoultry processingprevalencespoilage

Identifiers

PMID35681902
PMCPMC9179590
OpenAlexW4282053420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.