Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681872›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Impact of Indigestible Materials on the Efficiency of Fecal Corticosterone Immunoassay Testing in

Holly Racine, Kinsey Skalican Guthrie, Tyler Hill, Zachary Loughman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Holly RacineDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074, USA.
Kinsey Skalican GuthrieDepartment of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074, USA.
Tyler HillDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074, USA.
Zachary LoughmanDepartment of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1486-4999
West Liberty University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGM) has recently become a sought-after method for assessing stress in animals. While there are many benefits to this methodology, there are also recognized limitations, including the apprehensive interpretation of results. While many factors can influence FGM levels, we aimed to standardize and improve these methods in snakes. Fecal samples were collected from Pituophis species and FGMs were extracted by two different sample collection methods: (1) fecal sample containing undigested materials and (2) fecal samples with undigested materials removed. These extracts were then used to quantify FGM concentrations using a corticosterone EIA kit. The results indicated that the samples with the undigestible materials removed had a 95% increase in overall yield (p < 0.01). Since the collected fecal samples contain 75% undigestible materials by weight, these results support our hypothesis that removing these materials will improve extraction methods for a more reliable measurement of corticosterone. This is the first step towards standardizing the methods for assessing stress by measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in snakes.

Indexed as

corticosteroneenzyme immunoassayextractionfecesPituophisstress

Identifiers

PMID35681872
PMCPMC9179318
OpenAlexW4281992888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.