Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681721›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Impact of Age on Multimodality Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients.

Lindsey C F De Nes, Thea C Heil, Rob H A Verhoeven, Valery E P P Lemmens, Harm J Rutten, Johannes H W De Wilt, Pauline A J Vissers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical practice guidelines and associated survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsey C F De NesDepartment of Surgery, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, 5831 HA Boxmeer, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7923-6312
Thea C HeilDepartment of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7058-2013
Rob H A VerhoevenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-1611
Valery E P P LemmensDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harm J RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Johannes H W De WiltDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pauline A J VissersDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-888X
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation followed by radical surgery. This is challenging in the aging population because of frequently concomitant comorbidity. We analyzed whether age below and above 70 years is associated with differences in treatment strategy and outcome in this population-based study. Methods: Data between 2008 and 2016 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until 2021. Differences in therapy, referral and outcome were analyzed using χ2 tests, multivariable logistic regression and relative survival analysis. Results: In total, 6524 locally advanced rectal cancer patients were included. A greater proportion of patients <70 years underwent resection compared to older patients (89% vs. 71%). Patients ≥70 years were more likely treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.61−4.52), than with chemoradiation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.23−0.37) and less often referred to higher volume hospitals for resection (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51−0.87). Five-year relative survival after resection following neoadjuvant therapy was comparable and higher for both patients <70 years and ≥70 years (82% and 77%) than after resection only. Resection only was associated with worse survival in the elderly compared to younger patients (56% vs. 75%). Conclusion: Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received less intensive treatment and were less often referred to higher volume hospitals for surgery. Relative survival was good and comparable after optimal treatment in both age groups. Effort is necessary to improve guideline adherence, and multimodal strategies should be tailored to age, comorbidity and performance status.

Indexed as

elderly patientsgeriatric assessmentlocally advanced colorectal cancerpatient selectionsurvival

Identifiers

PMID35681721
PMCPMC9179565
OpenAlexW4281633307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.