Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681716›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Memantine in the Prevention of Radiation-Induced Brain Damage: A Narrative Review.

Claudia Scampoli, Silvia Cammelli, Erika Galietta, Giambattista Siepe, Milly Buwenge, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Deodato, Savino Cilla, Lidia Strigari, Silvia Chiesa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia ScampoliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Silvia CammelliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2111-0164
Erika GaliettaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5202-3472
Giambattista SiepeRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6308-1694
Milly BuwengeDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Gabriella MacchiaRadiation Oncology, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Francesco DeodatoRadiation Oncology, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1276-5070
Savino CillaMedical Physics, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Lidia StrigariMedical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-2298
Silvia ChiesaUOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessio Giuseppe MorgantiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-3410
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserving cognitive functions is a priority for most patients with brain metastases. Knowing the mechanisms of hyperglutamatergic neurotoxicity and the role of some hippocampal areas in cognitive decline (CD) led to testing both the antiglutamatergic pharmacological prophylaxis and hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) techniques. These studies showed a relative reduction in CD four to six months after WBRT. However, the failure to achieve statistical significance in one study that tested memantine alone (RTOG 0614) led to widespread skepticism about this drug in the WBRT setting. Moreover, interest grew in the reasons for the strong patient dropout rates in the first few months after WBRT and for early CD onset. In fact, the latter can only partially be explained by subclinical tumor progression. An emerging interpretation of the (not only) cognitive impairment during and immediately after WBRT is the dysfunction of the limbic and hypothalamic system with its immune and hormonal consequences. This new understanding of WBRT-induced toxicity may represent the basis for further innovative trials. These studies should aim to: (i) evaluate in greater detail the cognitive effects and, more generally, the quality of life impairment during and immediately after WBRT; (ii) study the mechanisms producing these early effects; (iii) test in clinical studies, the modern and advanced WBRT techniques based on both hippocampal-sparing and hypothalamic-pituitary-sparing, currently evaluated only in planning studies; (iv) test new timings of antiglutamatergic drugs administration aimed at preventing not only late toxicity but also acute effects.

Indexed as

brain damageliterature reviewmemantineprophylaxisradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35681716
PMCPMC9179311
OpenAlexW4281990035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.