Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681643›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Dual-Intended Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Ultrasound Imaging.

Nicolle Vigil, Madeline Barry, Arya Amini, Moulay Akhloufi, Xavier P V Maldague, Lan Ma, Lei Ren, Bardia Yousefi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolle VigilFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Madeline BarryFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Arya AminiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Moulay AkhloufiDepartment of Computer Science, Perception Robotics and Intelligent Machines (PRIME) Research Group, University of Moncton, New Brunswick, NB E1A 3E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-2669
Xavier P V MaldagueDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8777-2008
Lan MaFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Lei RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Bardia YousefiFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-4573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated medical data analysis demonstrated a significant role in modern medicine, and cancer diagnosis/prognosis to achieve highly reliable and generalizable systems. In this study, an automated breast cancer screening method in ultrasound imaging is proposed. A convolutional deep autoencoder model is presented for simultaneous segmentation and radiomic extraction. The model segments the breast lesions while concurrently extracting radiomic features. With our deep model, we perform breast lesion segmentation, which is linked to low-dimensional deep-radiomic extraction (four features). Similarly, we used high dimensional conventional imaging throughputs and applied spectral embedding techniques to reduce its size from 354 to 12 radiomics. A total of 780 ultrasound images-437 benign, 210, malignant, and 133 normal-were used to train and validate the models in this study. To diagnose malignant lesions, we have performed training, hyperparameter tuning, cross-validation, and testing with a random forest model. This resulted in a binary classification accuracy of 78.5% (65.1-84.1%) for the maximal (full multivariate) cross-validated model for a combination of radiomic groups.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningdimensionality reductionmedical image analysisradiomicsultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID35681643
PMCPMC9179519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.