Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681606›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Emerging Blood-Based Biomarkers for Predicting Immunotherapy Response in NSCLC.

Ana Oitabén, Pablo Fonseca, María J Villanueva, Carme García-Benito, Aida López-López, Alberto Garrido-Fernández, Clara González-Ojea, Laura Juaneda-Magdalena, Martín E Lázaro, Mónica Martínez-Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana OitabénTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Pablo FonsecaTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6084-9351
María J VillanuevaTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Carme García-BenitoTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2583-8769
Aida López-LópezTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Alberto Garrido-FernándezTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Clara González-OjeaTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Laura Juaneda-MagdalenaTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Martín E LázaroTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Mónica Martínez-FernándezTranslational Oncology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Sergas-Uvigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
University Hospital Complex Of Vigo · ESGalicia Sur Biomedical Foundation · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has demonstrated a profitable performance for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cancer treatment in some patients; however, there is still a percentage of patients in whom immunotherapy does not provide the desired results regarding beneficial outcomes. Therefore, obtaining predictive biomarkers for ICI response will improve the treatment management in clinical practice. In this sense, liquid biopsy appears as a promising method to obtain samples in a minimally invasive and non-biased way. In spite of its evident potential, the use of these circulating biomarkers is still very limited in the real clinical practice, mainly due to the huge heterogeneity among the techniques, the lack of consensus, and the limited number of patients included in these previous studies. In this work, we review the pros and cons of the different proposed biomarkers, such as soluble PD-L1, circulating non-coding RNA, circulating immune cells, peripheral blood cytokines, and ctDNA, obtained from liquid biopsy to predict response to ICI treatment at baseline and to monitor changes in tumor and tumor microenvironment during the course of the treatment in NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

bTMBctDNAcytokinesICIimmunotherapyncRNANSCLCPD-L1soluble biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35681606
PMCPMC9179588
OpenAlexW4281569520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.