Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681503›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Single Cell/Nucleus Transcriptomics Comparison in Zebrafish and Humans Reveals Common and Distinct Molecular Responses to Alzheimer's Disease.

Mehmet Ilyas Cosacak, Prabesh Bhattarai, Philip L De Jager, Vilas Menon, Giuseppe Tosto, Caghan Kizil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Zebrafish study provides evidence forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Local genetic correlation analysis of Alzheimer's disease and stroke implicatesmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehmet Ilyas CosacakGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden, Helmholtz Association, Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2978-3902
Prabesh BhattaraiGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden, Helmholtz Association, Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Philip L De JagerTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA.
Vilas MenonTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA.
Giuseppe TostoTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA.
Caghan KizilGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden, Helmholtz Association, Tatzberg 41, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8164-9762
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Elucidating changes in astrocyte subpopulations associated with resistance to Alzheimers Disease pathology in multi-ethnic cohortsR01AG066831 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MENON, VILAS · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogenesis is significantly reduced in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is a potential therapeutic target. Contrary to humans, a zebrafish can regenerate its diseased brain, and thus is ideal for studying neurogenesis. To compare the AD-related molecular pathways between humans and zebrafish, we compared single cell or nuclear transcriptomic data from a zebrafish amyloid toxicity model and its controls (N = 12) with the datasets of two human adult brains (N = 10 and N = 48 (Microglia)), and one fetal brain (N = 10). Approximately 95.4% of the human and zebrafish cells co-clustered. Within each cell type, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), enriched KEGG pathways, and gene ontology terms. We studied synergistic and non-synergistic DEGs to point at either common or uniquely altered mechanisms across species. Using the top DEGs, a high concordance in gene expression changes between species was observed in neuronal clusters. On the other hand, the molecular pathways affected by AD in zebrafish astroglia differed from humans in favor of the neurogenic pathways. The integration of zebrafish and human transcriptomes shows that the zebrafish can be used as a tool to study the cellular response to amyloid proteinopathies. Uniquely altered pathways in zebrafish could highlight the specific mechanisms underlying neurogenesis, which are absent in humans, and could serve as potential candidates for therapeutic developments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsHumansNeurogenesisSolitary NucleusTranscriptomeZebrafishadult brainAlzheimer’s diseaseastrogliafetal brainhumanmicroglianeuroregenerationsingle cell RNA sequencingsingle nuclear RNA sequencingtelencephalonzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35681503
PMCPMC9180693
OpenAlexW4281648502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.