Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681488›Full record

Trial reportCells2022

Effect of Sperm Selection by Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting in D-IUI: A Randomized Control Trial.

Cristina González-Ravina, Esther Santamaría-López, Alberto Pacheco, Julia Ramos, Francisco Carranza, Lucía Murria, Ana Ortiz-Vallecillo, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Screening of High-quality Spermatozoa Using Transwell Membrane Pores and Assessment of Their Performance].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  3. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation in reproduction: a SWOT analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina González-RavinaIVI-RMA Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio 19, 41092 Seville, Spain.
Esther Santamaría-LópezIVI-RMA Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio 19, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-9116
Alberto PachecoIVI-RMA Madrid, Avenida del Talgo 68, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Julia RamosIVI-RMA Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio 19, 41092 Seville, Spain.
Francisco CarranzaIVI-RMA Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio 19, 41092 Seville, Spain.
Lucía MurriaIVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-9345
Ana Ortiz-VallecilloIVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-1610
Manuel Fernández-SánchezIVI-RMA Seville, Avda. Américo Vespucio 19, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-2984
IVI Sevilla Clinic · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESIVI Madrid Clinic · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical outcome in assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is mainly influenced by the quality of gametes used. It is known that a high percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation (DNAf) decreases the success of ART clinical results. Therefore, techniques such as magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) help to improve results in cases of patients with a high percentage of DNAf. Cryopreservation of sperm in donor intrauterine insemination (D-IUI) treatments increases sperm DNAf, so patients using these sperm samples can benefit from using this technique. This prospective randomized national multicenter study analyzed clinical outcomes of 181 D-IUI treatments. MACS was performed after density gradient centrifugation (DGC) in 90 thawed semen donor samples (MACSG), whereas only DGC was performed in 91 thawed semen donor samples (CG). To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing the effect of MACS on D-IUI cycles. Our results show no significant differences in gestation, live birth, or miscarriage rates between the two groups. We believe that further studies with a larger sample size are needed to evaluate the application of MACS in combination with standard IUI donor sperm preparations in fertility clinics.

Indexed as

SpermatozoaTissue DonorsFemaleHumansInsemination, ArtificialMagnetic PhenomenaMaleProspective StudiesIUIMACSspermsperm DNA fragmentationsperm selection

Identifiers

PMID35681488
PMCPMC9180176
OpenAlexW4281843036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.