Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681413›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Combined Effect of Chitosan Coating and Laurel Essential Oil (

Lydia K Karakosta, Kornilia A Vatavali, Ioanna S Kosma, Anastasia V Badeka, Michael G Kontominas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded withOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Combined Effect of an Active AgIonFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lydia K KarakostaLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Kornilia A VatavaliLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Ioanna S KosmaLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7061-9349
Anastasia V BadekaLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Michael G KontominasLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined effect of chitosan coating (CHI) and laurel essential oil (LEO) on the shelf-life extension of water buffalo meat stored under aerobic packaging conditions at 4 °C was investigated. Microbiological, physicochemical, and sensory attributes were monitored over an 18-day storage period. Microbiological data indicated that the (CHI) coating along with (LEO) was the most efficient among treatments in reducing populations of bacteria by 3.2 log cfu/g on day 6 of storage (p < 0.05). pH values of meat varied between 6.04 and 6.21, while thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values were equal to or less than 2.12 mg malondialdehyde/kg throughout storage. The colour parameter L* and a* values decreased, while b* values increased during storage (p < 0.05). Taste proved to be a more sensitive sensory attribute than odour. Based on sensory and microbiological data, product shelf life was approximately 5−6 days for control samples, 7−8 days for samples treated with (LEO), 12 days for samples treated with (CHI), and 13−14 days for samples treated with (CHI + LEO).

Indexed as

chitosanlaurel essential oilpreservationshelf-life extensionwater buffalo meat

Identifiers

PMID35681413
PMCPMC9180035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.