Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681359›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Detection of Pesticide Residue Level in Grape Using Hyperspectral Imaging with Machine Learning.

Weixin Ye, Tianying Yan, Chu Zhang, Long Duan, Wei Chen, Hao Song, Yifan Zhang, Wei Xu, Pan Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Non-destructive analysis ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Identification and Classification ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weixin YeCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Tianying YanCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-3476
Chu ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-3154
Long DuanCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Wei ChenCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Hao SongCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Yifan ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832061, China.
Wei XuCollege of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832061, China.
Pan GaoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-3005

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32060685National Natural Science Foundation of China 61965014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of pesticide residue levels can help to prevent the harm of pesticide residue. This study used visible/near-infrared (Vis-NIR) (376-1044 nm) and near-infrared (NIR) (915-1699 nm) hyperspectral imaging systems (HISs) to detect the level of pesticide residues. Three different varieties of grapes were sprayed with four levels of pesticides. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), convolutional neural network (CNN), and residual neural network (ResNet) models were used to build classification models for pesticide residue levels. The saliency maps of CNN and ResNet were conducted to visualize the contribution of wavelengths. Overall, the results of NIR spectra performed better than those of Vis-NIR spectra. For Vis-NIR spectra, the best model was ResNet, with the accuracy of over 93%. For NIR spectra, LR was the best, with the accuracy of over 97%, but SVM, CNN, and ResNet also showed closed and fine results. The saliency map of CNN and ResNet presented similar and closed ranges of crucial wavelengths. Overall results indicated deep learning performed better than conventional machine learning. The study showed that the use of hyperspectral imaging technology combined with machine learning can effectively detect the level of pesticide residues in grapes.

Indexed as

deep learninghyperspectral imagingnon-destructive detectionpesticide residuetable grape

Identifiers

PMID35681359
PMCPMC9180647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.