Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681255›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2022

Birth length is the strongest predictor of linear growth status and stunting in the first 2 years of life after a preconception maternal nutrition intervention: the children of the Women First trial.

Nancy F Krebs, K Michael Hambidge, Jamie L Westcott, Ana L Garcés, Lester Figueroa, Antoinette K Tshefu, Adrien L Lokangaka, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Sangappa M Dhaded, Sarah Saleem and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01883193 (Women First), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01883193 nacompletednot on this map

Women First: Preconception Maternal Nutrition

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2013 to 2019Enrolled7,374ConditionsMaternal Malnutrition, Growth Failure, Mortality, MorbidityArmsComprehensive Maternal Nutrition Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nancy F KrebsDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
K Michael HambidgeDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Jamie L WestcottDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Ana L GarcésUnidad de Salud Materno Infantil, Instituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y Panamá (INCAP), Calzada Roosevelt, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Lester FigueroaUnidad de Salud Materno Infantil, Instituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y Panamá (INCAP), Calzada Roosevelt, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Antoinette K TshefuKinshasa School of Public Health, Hôpital Général de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Adrien L LokangakaKinshasa School of Public Health, Hôpital Général de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Shivaprasad S GoudarKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-7053
Sangappa M DhadedKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-5251
Sarah SaleemDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sumera Aziz AliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Melissa S BausermanDepartment of Pediatrics Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Richard J DermanDepartment of OBGYN, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert L GoldenbergDepartment of OBGYN, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abhik DasRTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Dhuly ChowdhuryRTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Women First Preconception Maternal Nutrition Study Group

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JANINE A HIGGINS · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
The University of North Carolina-Kinshasa School of Public Health Research Partnership in the Democratic Republic of Congo; a Model for Improving Women'sand Children's Health Through ResearchUG1HD076465 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MELISSA SCHWEIKHART BAUSERMAN · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
Nutrition-specific interventions to improve long-term maternal-child health outcomesUG1HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Edwin Jose Asturias, NANCY F KREBS · 2018 to 2026
$5.4M
The Global Network and Preconception Maternal NutritionU10HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAMBIDGE, K MICHAEL, KREBS, NANCY F · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076474NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076465NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076474NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multicountry Women First trial demonstrated that nutritional supplementation initiated prior to conception (arm 1) or early pregnancy (arm 2) and continued until delivery resulted in significantly greater length at birth and 6 mo compared with infants in the control arm (arm 3).

objectivesWe evaluated intervention effects on infants' longitudinal growth trajectory from birth through 24 mo and identified predictors of length status and stunting at 24 mo.

methodsInfants' anthropometry was obtained at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the Women First trial (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01883193), which was conducted in low-resource settings: Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, and Pakistan. Longitudinal models evaluated intervention effects on infants' growth trajectory from birth to 24 mo, with additional modeling used to identify adjusted predictors for growth trajectories and outcomes at 24 mo.

resultsData for 2337 (95% of original live births) infants were evaluated. At 24 mo, stunting rates were 62.8%, 64.8%, and 66.3% for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively (NS). For the length-for-age z-score (LAZ) trajectory, treatment arm was a significant predictor, with adjusted mean differences of 0.19 SD (95% CI: 0.08, 0.30; P < 0.001) and 0.17 SD (95% CI: 0.07, 0.27; P < 0.001) for arms 1 and 2, respectively. The strongest predictors of LAZ at 24 mo were birth LAZ <-2 and <-1 to ≥-2, with adjusted mean differences of -0.76 SD (95% CI: -0.93, -0.58; P < 0.001) and -0.47 SD (95% CI: -0.56, -0.38; P < 0.001), respectively. For infants with ultrasound-determined gestational age (n = 1329), the strongest predictors of stunting were birth LAZ <-2 and <-1 to ≥- 2: adjusted relative risk of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.39, 1.88; P < 0.001) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.31, 1.62; P < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsSubstantial improvements in postnatal growth are likely to depend on improved intrauterine growth, especially during early pregnancy.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnthropometryChildDietary SupplementsFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancybirth lengthbreastfeedinggrowthinfant growthmaternal heightpreconceptionstunting

Identifiers

PMID35681255
PMCPMC9257468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.