Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681208›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Effects of oral treatment with chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine in an experimental model of metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis in horses.

Ana Lucia Miluzzi Yamada, Cynthia do Prado Vendruscolo, Marília Ferrari Marsiglia, Eric Danilo Pauls Sotelo, Fernanda Rodrigues Agreste, Sarah Raphaela Torquato Seidel, Joice Fülber, Raquel Yvonne Arantes Baccarin, Luis Claudio Lopes Correia da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Lucia Miluzzi YamadaDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil. anamyamada@usp.br.
Cynthia do Prado VendruscoloDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Marília Ferrari MarsigliaDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Eric Danilo Pauls SoteloDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Fernanda Rodrigues AgresteDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Sarah Raphaela Torquato SeidelDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Joice FülberDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Raquel Yvonne Arantes BaccarinDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Luis Claudio Lopes Correia da SilvaDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05508-270, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/07255-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine (GlcN) has been widely used in oral formulations to prevent and treat osteoarthritis. CS is effective for controlling pain in osteoarthritic patients, whereas GlcN can stimulate glycosaminoglycan synthesis, thus reducing extracellular matrix degradation. Although several studies have been published on this topic, the effectiveness of treatment with oral CS and GlcN remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze the progression of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in horses and verify the effectiveness of an oral compound based on CS and GlcN to treat and/or modulate this disease. The study analyzed the metacarpophalangeal joint of the left thoracic limb of 16 horses divided into two groups, with eight horses treated with CS and GlcN in the treated group (GT) and eight untreated horses in the control group (GC). Chondral lesions were induced through arthroscopy, which was defined as time-point zero (T0). Physical, ultrasonographic, and radiographic examinations and synovial fluid biomarkers measurements were performed on days 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120. At the end of the experiment (T4), arthroscopy was performed again to macroscopically evaluate the joints and collect material for microscopic analysis.

resultsSignificant differences were observed between groups in some evaluated parameters, such as visual lameness assessment, synovial concentrations of prostaglandin E2, and ultrasound examination. However, the GT still presented slightly improved results for joint flexion angle, analysis of lameness using sensors, and histopathological analysis of chondral repair tissue, however, without the statistical significance (p>0.05).

conclusionsThe treatment was considered effective in the clinical modulation of experimental osteoarthritis, with improvement of some parameters in the GT. However, this type of treatment may not be entirely effective to change the catabolic process in articular cartilage and the progressive induced chondral damage.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularHorse DiseasesOsteoarthritisAnimalsChondroitin SulfatesGlucosamineHorsesLameness, AnimalModels, TheoreticalSynovial FluidChondroitin SulfatesGlucosamineEquineGlycosaminoglycanJointLamenessOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35681208
PMCPMC9178899
OpenAlexW4281854294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.