Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681156›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2022

Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal SCC: outcomes and complications.

Ehsan Soltani, Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh, Azadeh Jabbari Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi, Khosrow Ravankhah Moghaddam, Ehsan Hassanzadeh Haddad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer in a third level center].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transthoracic versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ehsan SoltaniSurgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Habibollah MahmoodzadehCancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh Jabbari NooghabiSurgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. jabbaria@mums.ac.ir.
Mehdi Jabbari NooghabiDepartment of Statistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Khosrow Ravankhah MoghaddamSurgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ehsan Hassanzadeh HaddadSurgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranshiatal esophagectomy (THE) and transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) are both accepted procedures for esophageal cancer but still the most effective surgical approach continues to be controversial. This study aimed to determine post-operative complications and outcomes of TTE compared with THE.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on data of 243 adult patients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent THE or TTE between December 2016 and October 2018. Demographic data, consisting of preoperative co-morbidities, disease stage, and perioperative morbidity and mortality were collected.

resultsAmong the patients, 99 individuals (40.7%) had a transhiatal resection and 144 (59.3%) had a transthoracic resection. Most patients (83.1%) were above 50 years old with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.297). The frequency distribution of comorbidities was similar in both groups. The most common site of the tumor in TTE group was middle esophagus and in THE group was lower esophagus. The most common complication was recurrence of dysphagia which was more common in THE group without significant difference. The other complications including pulmonary and cardiac events, tracheal and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, chylothorax and anastomosis stricture did not differ between the groups. The operative mortality within 30 days after the operation was 2.8% with significant difference favored the THE group (THE 0%, TTE 5.2%, p = 0.033).

conclusionBecause of the controversies, the decision on the type of surgical technique in esophageal cancer treatment hinges on patient's co-morbidities, cancer stage, tumor location and surgeon's experience.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAdultEsophagectomyHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesComplicationEsophagectomyTranshiatalTransthoracic

Identifiers

PMID35681156
PMCPMC9185877
OpenAlexW4282929338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.