Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681147›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

Surrogate biomarkers of outcome for wake-up ischemic stroke.

Pablo Hervella, María Luz Alonso-Alonso, María Pérez-Mato, Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez, Susana Arias-Rivas, Iria López-Dequidt, José M Pumar, Tomás Sobrino, Francisco Campos, José Castillo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo HervellaNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. pablo.hervella.lorenzo@sergas.es.
María Luz Alonso-AlonsoNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Pérez-MatoNeuroscience and Cerebrovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, La Paz University Hospital, Neuroscience Area of IdiPAZ Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Rodríguez-YáñezStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Susana Arias-RivasStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Iria López-DequidtStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José M PumarNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Tomás SobrinoNeuroaging Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Francisco CamposTranslational Stroke Laboratory (TREAT), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José CastilloNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ramón Iglesias-ReyNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. ramon.iglesias.rey@sergas.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-9135
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III CD19/00033Instituto de Salud Carlos III CPII17/00027Instituto de Salud Carlos III CPII19/00020Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/00540Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/01103Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI21/01256Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation SAF2017-84267-RSpanish Research Network on Cerebrovascular Diseases RETICS-INVICTUS PLUS (RD16/0019/0001) (RD16/0019/0001)Xunta de Galicia (Consellería de Educación: IN607A2018/3) IN607A2018/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWake-up ischemic stroke (IS) has been usually excluded from acute stroke therapy options for being outside of the safe treatment window. We identified risk factors, and clinical or molecular biomarkers that could be therapeutic targets for wake-up stroke prevention, thus hopefully leading to a decrease in its mortality and disability in medium to long-term outcome.

methods4251 ischemic stroke (IS) patients from a prospectively registered database were recruited; 3838 (90.3%) had known onset-symptom time, and 413 (9.7%) were wake-up strokes. The main endpoint was to analyze the association between different serum biomarkers with wake-up IS episodes and their progression. Leukocytes count, serum levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and vitamin D were analyzed as inflammation biomarkers; N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic-Peptide and microalbuminuria, used as atrial/endothelial dysfunction biomarkers; finally, glutamate levels as excitotoxicity biomarker. In addition, demographic, clinical and neuroimaging variables associated with the time-evolution of wake-up IS patients and functional outcome at 3 months were evaluated. Good and poor functional outcome were defined as mRS ≤2 and mRS > 2 at 3 months, respectively.

resultsWake-up IS showed a poorer outcome at 3-months than in patients with known on-set-symptom time (59.1% vs. 48.1%; p < 0.0001). Patients with wake-up IS had higher levels of inflammation biomarkers; IL-6 levels at admission (51.5 ± 15.1 vs. 27.8 ± 18.6 pg/ml; p < 0.0001), and low vitamin D levels at 24 h (5.6 ± 5.8 vs. 19.2 ± 9.4 ng/ml; p < 0.0001) are worthy of attention. In a logistic regression model adjusted for vitamin D, OR was 15.1; CI 95%: 8.6-26.3, p < 0.0001. However, we found no difference in vitamin D levels between patients with or without clinical-DWI mismatch (no: 18.95 ± 9.66; yes: 17.84 ± 11.77 ng/mL, p = 0.394). No difference in DWI volume at admission was found (49.3 ± 96.9 ml in wake-up IS patients vs. 51.7 ± 98.2 ml in awake IS patients; p = 0.895).

conclusionsInflammatory biomarkers are the main factors that are strongly associated with wake-up IS episodes. Wake-up IS is associated with lower vitamin D levels. These data indicate that vitamin D deficiency could become a therapeutic target to reduce wake-up IS events.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeBiomarkersHumansInflammationInterleukin-6Vitamin DBiomarkersInterleukin-6Vitamin DBiomarkerPrognosisStroke preventionVitamin DWake-up stroke

Identifiers

PMID35681147
PMCPMC9178818
OpenAlexW4281751916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.