Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681103›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2022

Closing the loop for patients with Parkinson disease: where are we?

Hazhir Teymourian, Farshad Tehrani, Katherine Longardner, Kuldeep Mahato, Tatiana Podhajny, Jong-Min Moon, Yugender Goud Kotagiri, Juliane R Sempionatto, Irene Litvan, Joseph Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Smart closed-loop drug delivery systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Digitized Memory Clinic.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hazhir Teymourian *Department of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-4732
Farshad Tehrani *Department of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Katherine Longardner *Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kuldeep MahatoDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Tatiana PodhajnyDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jong-Min MoonDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Yugender Goud KotagiriDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-0489
Juliane R SempionattoDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Irene LitvanDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. ilitvan@health.ucsd.edu.
Joseph WangDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. josephwang@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-9674
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Real-Time L-Dopa Monitoring for Improved Management of Parkinson DiseaseR21NS114764 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LITVAN, IRENE, WANG, JOSEPH · 2020 to 2020
$434k
NINDS NIH HHS NS114764-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although levodopa remains the most efficacious symptomatic therapy for Parkinson disease (PD), management of levodopa treatment during the advanced stages of the disease is extremely challenging. This difficulty is a result of levodopa's short half-life, a progressive narrowing of the therapeutic window, and major inter-patient and intra-patient variations in the dose-response relationship. Therefore, a suitable alternative to repeated oral administration of levodopa is being sought. Recent research efforts have focused on the development of novel levodopa delivery strategies and wearable physical sensors that track symptoms and disease progression. However, the need for methods to monitor the levels of levodopa present in the body in real time has been overlooked. Advances in chemical sensor technology mean that the development of wearable and mobile biosensors for continuous or frequent levodopa measurements is now possible. Such levodopa monitoring could help to deliver personalized and timely medication dosing to alleviate treatment-related fluctuations in the symptoms of PD. Therefore, with the aim of optimizing therapeutic management of PD and improving the quality of life of patients, we share our vision of a future closed-loop autonomous wearable 'sense-and-act' system. This system consists of a network of physical and chemical sensors coupled with a levodopa delivery device and is guided by effective big data fusion algorithms and machine learning methods.

Indexed as

LevodopaParkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsDisease ProgressionHumansQuality of LifeAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID35681103
OpenAlexW4282928366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.