Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Novel electromagnetic induction heat curing process of fly ash geopolymer using waste iron powder as a conductive material.

Toon Nongnuang, Peerapong Jitsangiam, Ubolluk Rattanasak, Prinya Chindaprasirt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Toon NongnuangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Huay Kaew Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Peerapong JitsangiamCenter of Excellence in Natural Disaster Management, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. peerapong@eng.cmu.ac.th.
Ubolluk RattanasakDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand.
Prinya ChindaprasirtSustainable Infrastructure Research and Development Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Funding

Department of Civil Engineering, Chiang Mai University 001Research and Graduate Studies, Khon Kaen University 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer (GP) was invented to replace concrete, but its heat curing requirement hinders extensive use in real-world construction. Past studies have tested several methods of heat curing. However, the conventional heat curing process (using an oven) is still required for GP to develop good strength on the laboratory scale. This study introduces a new heat curing method for GP based on an electromagnetic field (EMF)generator and a ferromagnetic material. Waste iron powder (WIP) was used as the ferromagnetic material mixed with the fly ash-based GP to generate heat through induction. The sample was cured at 1.18 kW with 150-200 kHz of EMF generator for 15 min. The results showed that 5% of the WIP mixed sample gained compressive and flexural strength at 28 days more than the control (oven-cured). Compressive and flexural strengths of 76.8 MPa and 11.3 MPa were obtained, respectively. In addition, heat induction enhanced the densification and geopolymerization in the GP matrix following SEM and XRD results. This alternative method of heat curing accelerated the formation of the GP matrix, reduced curing time, and increased strength. Moreover, this EMF curing method can save 99.70% of the energy consumed compared to the conventional heat curing method.

Identifiers

PMID35681065
PMCPMC9184480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.