Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35681047›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2023

Defining brain-based OCD patient profiles using task-based fMRI and unsupervised machine learning.

Alessandro S De Nadai, Kate D Fitzgerald, Luke J Norman, Stefanie R Russman Block, Kristin A Mannella, Joseph A Himle, Stephan F Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro S De NadaiDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. adenadai@txstate.edu.
Kate D FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Luke J NormanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stefanie R Russman BlockDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kristin A MannellaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joseph A HimleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stephan F TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8777-4292
University of Michigan · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USTexas State University · US

Funding

Neurocircuit mechanisms of OCD across the lifespanR01MH102242 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FITZGERALD, KATE DIMOND, TAYLOR, STEPHAN F · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Dimensional Brain Behavior Predictors of CBT Outcomes in Pediatric AnxietyR01MH107419 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MONK, CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102242NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While much research has highlighted phenotypic heterogeneity in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), less work has focused on heterogeneity in neural activity. Conventional neuroimaging approaches rely on group averages that assume homogenous patient populations. If subgroups are present, these approaches can increase variability and can lead to discrepancies in the literature. They can also obscure differences between various subgroups. To address this issue, we used unsupervised machine learning to identify subgroup clusters of patients with OCD who were assessed by task-based fMRI. We predominantly focused on activation of cognitive control and performance monitoring neurocircuits, including three large-scale brain networks that have been implicated in OCD (the frontoparietal network, cingulo-opercular network, and default mode network). Participants were patients with OCD (n = 128) that included both adults (ages 24-45) and adolescents (ages 12-17), as well as unaffected controls (n = 64). Neural assessments included tests of cognitive interference and error processing. We found three patient clusters, reflecting a "normative" cluster that shared a brain activation pattern with unaffected controls (65.9% of clinical participants), as well as an "interference hyperactivity" cluster (15.2% of clinical participants) and an "error hyperactivity" cluster (18.9% of clinical participants). We also related these clusters to demographic and clinical correlates. After post-hoc correction for false discovery rates, the interference hyperactivity cluster showed significantly longer reaction times than the other patient clusters, but no other between-cluster differences in covariates were detected. These findings increase precision in patient characterization, reframe prior neurobehavioral research in OCD, and provide a starting point for neuroimaging-guided treatment selection.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingChildHumansMiddle AgedUnsupervised Machine LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35681047
PMCPMC9751092
OpenAlexW4281798347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.