Trial reportSpinal cord2022
The experiences of people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease during intensive balance training and the impact of the program: A qualitative study.
Trial report in Spinal cord, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying priorities for balance interventions through a participatory co-design approach with end-users.BMC neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designQualitative descriptive study.
objectivesTo gain insight into if and how participation in intensive balance training impacted the daily lives and risk of falling of people living with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D), as well as to understand what motivated participation and what benefits and challenges, if any, they experienced while completing training.
settingTertiary rehabilitation hospital.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted three to four months after 20 participants with incomplete SCI/D completed either Perturbation-based Balance Training or Conventional Intensive Balance Training as part of a randomized clinical trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using conventional content analysis by two researchers. Codes were discussed for consensus, and subcategories and categories were created, which were confirmed by another two researchers.
resultsThe following categories were identified: 1) goals of balance training, 2) valuable components of balance training, 3) physical gains from balance training, 4) psychosocial gains from participating in balance training, and 5) unique aspects of Perturbation-based Balance Training. Each category consisted of several subcategories.
conclusionsCollecting qualitative data facilitated the evaluation of the meaningfulness of the balance training programs to the participants. These findings demonstrate that balance training was perceived as beneficial and enjoyable for individuals with incomplete SCI/D, and that these programs provided challenge and educational opportunities for the participants while improving balance confidence and reducing perceived fall risk. These findings have implications to direct future research studies or implementation of balance training in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35680989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.