ArticleScientific reports2022
Authorship identification using ensemble learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authorship identification for Chinese literature based on a pyramid deep bidirectional gated recurrent unit network with voting strategy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of algorithmic approaches in ensemble learning: bagging vs. boosting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An ensemble deep learning model for author identification through multiple features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated ensemble of BERT- and feature-based models for authorship attribution in Japanese literary works.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Rhythmic qualities of jazz improvisation predict performer identity and style in source-separated audio recordings.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Learning from virtual experiments to assist users of Small Angle Neutron Scattering in model selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A Movie Recommender System Based on User Profile and Artificial Bee Colony Optimization.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Assemble the shallow or integrate a deep? Toward a lightweight solution for glyph-aware Chinese text classification.PloS one · 2023Article
- LSTM-DGWO-Based Sentiment Analysis Framework for Analyzing Online Customer Reviews.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Meta-Path-Based Evaluation Method for Enterprise Credit Risk.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- TAFM: A Recommendation Algorithm Based on Text-Attention Factorization Mechanism.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- An efficient approach for textual data classification using deep learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With time, textual data is proliferating, primarily through the publications of articles. With this rapid increase in textual data, anonymous content is also increasing. Researchers are searching for alternative strategies to identify the author of an unknown text. There is a need to develop a system to identify the actual author of unknown texts based on a given set of writing samples. This study presents a novel approach based on ensemble learning, DistilBERT, and conventional machine learning techniques for authorship identification. The proposed approach extracts the valuable characteristics of the author using a count vectorizer and bi-gram Term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). An extensive and detailed dataset, "All the news" is used in this study for experimentation. The dataset is divided into three subsets (article1, article2, and article3). We limit the scope of the dataset and selected ten authors in the first scope and 20 authors in the second scope for experimentation. The experimental results of proposed ensemble learning and DistilBERT provide better performance for all the three subsets of the "All the news" dataset. In the first scope, the experimental results prove that the proposed ensemble learning approach from 10 authors provides a better accuracy gain of 3.14% and from DistilBERT 2.44% from the article1 dataset. Similarly, in the second scope from 20 authors, the proposed ensemble learning approach provides a better accuracy gain of 5.25% and from DistilBERT 7.17% from the article1 dataset, which is better than previous state-of-the-art studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.