Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Authorship identification using ensemble learning.

Ahmed Abbasi, Abdul Rehman Javed, Farkhund Iqbal, Zunera Jalil, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Natalia Kryvinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Meta-Path-Based Evaluation Method for Enterprise Credit Risk.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed AbbasiDepartment of Creative Technologies, PAF Complex, E-9, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abdul Rehman JavedDepartment of Cyber Security, PAF Complex, E-9, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan. abdulrehman.cs@au.edu.pk.
Farkhund IqbalCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Zunera JalilDepartment of Creative Technologies, PAF Complex, E-9, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Thippa Reddy GadekalluSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India. Thippareddy@ieee.org.
Natalia KryvinskaInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Management, Comenius University in Bratislava, Odbojárov 10, 82005, Bratislava 25, Slovakia. natalia.kryvinska@fm.uniba.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With time, textual data is proliferating, primarily through the publications of articles. With this rapid increase in textual data, anonymous content is also increasing. Researchers are searching for alternative strategies to identify the author of an unknown text. There is a need to develop a system to identify the actual author of unknown texts based on a given set of writing samples. This study presents a novel approach based on ensemble learning, DistilBERT, and conventional machine learning techniques for authorship identification. The proposed approach extracts the valuable characteristics of the author using a count vectorizer and bi-gram Term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). An extensive and detailed dataset, "All the news" is used in this study for experimentation. The dataset is divided into three subsets (article1, article2, and article3). We limit the scope of the dataset and selected ten authors in the first scope and 20 authors in the second scope for experimentation. The experimental results of proposed ensemble learning and DistilBERT provide better performance for all the three subsets of the "All the news" dataset. In the first scope, the experimental results prove that the proposed ensemble learning approach from 10 authors provides a better accuracy gain of 3.14% and from DistilBERT 2.44% from the article1 dataset. Similarly, in the second scope from 20 authors, the proposed ensemble learning approach provides a better accuracy gain of 5.25% and from DistilBERT 7.17% from the article1 dataset, which is better than previous state-of-the-art studies.

Indexed as

AuthorshipMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35680983
PMCPMC9184563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.