ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Realistic C-arm to pCT registration for vertebral localization in spine surgery : A hybrid 3D-2D registration framework for intraoperative vertebral pose estimation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Screw Trajectory Planning Model Based on Iterative Closest Point Registration and Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithms for Cortical Bone and Pedicle Screw Techniques.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Feature-based multimodal 3D/2D and 3D/3D registration framework for pedicle screw registration and evaluation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Highly Accelerated Dual-Pose Medical Image Registration via Improved Differential Evolution.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Load-bearing optimization for customized exoskeleton design based on kinematic gait reconstruction.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Feature-based multimodal registration framework for vertebral pose estimation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spine surgeries are vulnerable to wrong-level surgeries and postoperative complications because of their complex structure. Unavailability of the 3D intraoperative imaging device, low-contrast intraoperative X-ray images, variable clinical and patient conditions, manual analyses, lack of skilled technicians, and human errors increase the chances of wrong-site or wrong-level surgeries. State of the art work refers 3D-2D image registration systems and other medical image processing techniques to address the complications associated with spine surgeries. Intensity-based 3D-2D image registration systems had been widely practiced across various clinical applications. However, these frameworks are limited to specific clinical conditions such as anatomy, dimension of image correspondence, and imaging modalities. Moreover, there are certain prerequisites for these frameworks to function in clinical application, such as dataset requirement, speed of computation, requirement of high-end system configuration, limited capture range, and multiple local maxima. A simple and effective registration framework was designed with a study objective of vertebral level identification and its pose estimation from intraoperative fluoroscopic images by combining intensity-based and iterative control point (ICP)-based 3D-2D registration. A hierarchical multi-stage registration framework was designed that comprises coarse and finer registration. The coarse registration was performed in two stages, i.e., intensity similarity-based spatial localization and source-to-detector localization based on the intervertebral distance correspondence between vertebral centroids in projected and intraoperative X-ray images. Finally, to speed up target localization in the intraoperative application, based on 3D-2D vertebral centroid correspondence, a rigid ICP-based finer registration was performed. The mean projection distance error (mPDE) measurement and visual similarity between projection image at finer registration point and intraoperative X-ray image and surgeons' feedback were held accountable for the quality assurance of the designed registration framework. The average mPDE after peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR)-based coarse registration was 20.41mm. After the coarse registration in spatial region and source to detector direction, the average mPDE reduced to 12.18mm. On finer ICP-based registration, the mean mPDE was finally reduced to 0.36 mm. The approximate mean time required for the coarse registration, finer registration, and DRR image generation at the final registration point were 10 s, 15 s, and 1.5 min, respectively. The designed registration framework can act as a supporting tool for vertebral level localization and its pose estimation in an intraoperative environment. The framework was designed with the future perspective of intraoperative target localization and its pose estimation irrespective of the target anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.