Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680726›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Tia Y Brodeur, Daniel Grow, Navid Esfandiari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evolving PCOS Management: From Symptom Control to Phenotype-Targeted Therapy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  7. Identifying Barriers to Fertility Preservation in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. GYNs at the REI gates: unsolvable conundrum or unambiguous opportunity?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tia Y BrodeurDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-9350
Daniel GrowThe Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0351-0351
Navid EsfandiariDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. navid.esfandiari@uvmhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0979-5236
University of Vermont · USUConn Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility has a prevalence of up to 16% worldwide and is on the rise in developed nations, largely due to pursuing childbearing at advanced reproductive ages. Advances in assisted reproductive technology have benefitted socioeconomically advantaged patients disproportionately. High costs of fertility care are largely responsible for this disparity; however, patients in rural areas also face barriers in accessing both gynecology and reproductive endocrinology subspecialty care. Here, focusing on the USA, we discuss fertility care in geographically underserved areas and low-resource settings, and the impact on reproductive outcomes. Increased innovation to improve patient access to fertility care such as assisted reproductive technology is critical for ensuring equity. Remote monitoring is frequently performed by fertility centers, but partnership with local gynecologists has also been demonstrated to be an effective assisted reproductive technology monitoring method. Telehealth is now in mainstream use and the continued application to reduce geographic barriers to infertility patients is imperative. Partnership between local gynecologists and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists may improve patient access to fertility care and provide the unique benefits of continuity and ongoing local social support.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationInfertilityHumansMedically Underserved AreaReproductive Techniques, AssistedVulnerable PopulationsHealth disparitiesHealth equityInfertilityRural fertility treatment

Identifiers

PMID35680726
PMCPMC9181892
OpenAlexW4281734909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.