ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Can endometrial thickness at baseline or maximum stimulated levels during IVF predict the presence of endometrial polyps in women with two failed embryo transfers?
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether different measurements of endometrial thickness pre-IVF cycle and during the IVF cycles as measured by transvaginal ultrasound are associated with the absence or presence of endometrial polyps.
designA retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility center. Patients were women who underwent two embryo transfer cycles and failed to conceive.
interventionshysteroscopic evaluation and resection of any masses.
resultsThere was no difference on comparing the groups with and without polyps in the mean endometrial thicknesses at baseline scans pre-treatment or during IVF cycle. For women who failed two embryo transfer cycles, at any given endometrial thickness the probability of the presence of a polyp was 30-40%. ROC curves failed to detect an actionable relationship with different endometrial thicknesses and the relationship with an endometrial polyp, with most areas under the curve being just above 0.5. However, once the maximum stimulated endometrial thickness was ≥ 13 mm, there was a 70% chance of a polyp being noted at hysteroscopy. This was a statistical difference in the probability of a polyp being present as compared to the lesser thicknesses (p = 0.05).
conclusionBaseline or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness at IVF fails to predict with accuracy the presence of a polyp. However, if the maximum stimulated thickness was at least 13 mm, there was a higher probability of a uterine polyp being present. Such a cutoff would nevertheless miss most polyps. At any baseline thickness on CD 2-5, a polyp has a 30-40% probability of being present in women who failed two embryo transfers. ROC curves suggest that at baseline, or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness, the ability to predict a polyp is no better than flipping a coin. As such, endometrial cavity evaluation for polyps is legitimate in women with two embryo transfers irrelevant of the baseline or stimulated thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.