Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680431›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2022

Dynamic Resting-State Network Biomarkers of Antidepressant Treatment Response.

Roselinde H Kaiser, Henry W Chase, Mary L Phillips, Thilo Deckersbach, Ramin V Parsey, Maurizio Fava, Patrick J McGrath, Myrna Weissman, Maria A Oquendo, Melvin G McInnis and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From rest to focus: pharmacological modulation of the relationship between resting state dorsal attention network dynamics and task-based brain activation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Executive Dysfunction and Depression Risk in Adolescence: Functional-MRI Analysis of Transient Network States During a Working Memory Task.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sex-specific resting state brain network dynamics in patients with major depressive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Roselinde H KaiserDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Renée Crown Wellness Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado. Electronic address: Roselinde.Kaiser@colorado.edu.
Henry W ChaseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mary L PhillipsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Thilo DeckersbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ramin V ParseyDepartment of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Maurizio FavaDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Patrick J McGrathDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Myrna WeissmanDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Maria A OquendoDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Melvin G McInnisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Thomas CarmodyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Crystal M CooperDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Madhukar H TrivediDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Diego A PizzagalliDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and McLean Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USCrown College · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Establishing Moderators/Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response- Clinical CareU01MH092221 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2010 to 2015
$9.7M
Biosignatures of Treatment Remission in Major DepressionU01MH092250 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MCGRATH, PATRICK J, PARSEY, RAMIN V. · 2010 to 2015
$8.9M
Biotyping Mood Health in Late Adolescence: Neurocognitive Dimensions and Stress PathwaysR01MH117131 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KAISER, ROSELINDE H · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117131NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092221NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelivery of effective antidepressant treatment has been hampered by a lack of objective tools for predicting or monitoring treatment response. This study aimed to address this gap by testing novel dynamic resting-state functional network markers of antidepressant response.

methodsThe Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care (EMBARC) study randomized adults with major depressive disorder to 8 weeks of either sertraline or placebo, and depression severity was evaluated longitudinally. Participants completed resting-state neuroimaging pretreatment and again after 1 week of treatment (n = 259 eligible for analyses). Coactivation pattern analyses identified recurrent whole-brain states of spatial coactivation, and computed time spent in each state for each participant was the main dynamic measure. Multilevel modeling estimated the associations between pretreatment network dynamics and sertraline response and between early (pretreatment to 1 week) changes in network dynamics and sertraline response.

resultsDynamic network markers of early sertraline response included increased time in network states consistent with canonical default and salience networks, together with decreased time in network states characterized by coactivation of cingulate and ventral limbic or temporal regions. The effect of sertraline on depression recovery was mediated by these dynamic network changes. In contrast, early changes in dynamic functioning of corticolimbic and frontoinsular-default networks were related to patterns of symptom recovery common across treatment groups.

conclusionsDynamic resting-state markers of early antidepressant response or general recovery may assist development of clinical tools for monitoring and predicting effective intervention.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderSertralineAdultAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkersSertralineAntidepressantBiomarkerDepressionDynamicNetworkResting-state

Identifiers

PMID35680431
PMCPMC10640874
OpenAlexW4226403393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.